Jump to content

Maths Teaser Adults can't do.


Recommended Posts

It's been shown here that the question was wrong!

 

 

Either way, whosoever is struggling with it have only got a primary understanding of basic maths (or worse!).

The question is only wrong in so far as it, sensibly, should have asked for the weight of the other unknown parcel, which meant extraneous information was provided in the question.

 

However, a natural by-product of working out the weight of one of the unknown parcels is that you then know the weight of the other

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is only wrong in so far as it, sensibly, should have asked for the weight of the other unknown parcel, which meant extraneous information was provided in the question.

 

However, a natural by-product of working out the weight of one of the unknown parcels is that you then know the weight of the other

 

Can we have a question involving pulleys next please?

 

Or would this be the next logical step?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simultaneous_equations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You left out this bit:

 

 

 

As to the question being wrong:

 

 

Which makes sense.

But as there are only 3 parcels, you know the weight of one and the total of the three. One would have to be spectacularly daft to calculate B but not know C.

 

The relevance of which one actually is the answer, only matters if the question is going to be marked, and that mark means something significant in your life, surely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But as there are only 3 parcels, you know the weight of one and the total of the three. One would have to be spectacularly daft to calculate B but not know C.

 

The relevance of which one actually is the answer, only matters if the question is going to be marked, and that mark means something significant in your life, surely?

 

So am I right or wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But as there are only 3 parcels, you know the weight of one and the total of the three. One would have to be spectacularly daft to calculate B but not know C.

 

The relevance of which one actually is the answer, only matters if the question is going to be marked, and that mark means something significant in your life, surely?

 

The superfluous information indicates to many that the question was obviously wrong in some way, this was then shown to be the case.

 

In the OP's example, you don't need to know the weight of A to work out the answer of C, but for B you need to know A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.