Jump to content

Home ownership vastly exaggerated.


Recommended Posts

Other factors need to be taken into consideration.

Many who bought their counci houssl couldn't afford the deposit for a mortgage on a private property after paying rent. Mortgages were not as easy to get in the 1970s when only a mans wage was taken into consideration and only 2.5 times his salary was offered.

By selling council houses it relieved the council of the expense of maintainining and modernising these sold houses.

It relieved them of the burden of subsidising and collecting rents.

Many of the houses had already been paid for in relation to building costs.

But the main very astute difference is that a tenant who bought their home is liable to have to use the value of their home(anything over £23,000) to pay for care costs.

The revenue collected from the sales should have been invested in new council housing.

 

That's a relatively recent change, it wasn't the case when the RTB was introduced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many people end up having to pay "care costs" though?

 

Legally the council can claim the costs from any savings or property you own above the value of £23K.

It is also illegal to give away savings or property if it is viewed as avoidance to pay care fees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Legally the council can claim the costs from any savings or property you own above the value of £23K.

It is also illegal to give away savings or property if it is viewed as avoidance to pay care fees.

 

So how many people end up paying care costs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last decade I reckon, google might know exactly.

Long term planning.

Many years ago a colleague told me it should be everyones aim to reach 65 and be in council housing with no savings and throw yourself onto the councils paid for system.

I laughed at him as I beleived we should all try to better ourselves and leave something for our children.

As I get older I think he was probably right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long term planning.

Many years ago a colleague told me it should be everyones aim to reach 65 and be in council housing with no savings and throw yourself onto the councils paid for system.

I laughed at him as I beleived we should all try to better ourselves and leave something for our children.

As I get older I think he was probably right.

 

Politicians are rarely capable of planning more than 5 years ahead. Cross party planning over 30 years, I don't think it's remotely possible, looking for a conspiracy theory where none is needed I'm afraid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.