Jump to content

People alive today that will go down in history


Recommended Posts

All Prime ministers are remembered in history

 

In historical record, yes; but very few ordinary people could tell you anything at all about Campbell-Bannermann, Lord North, and so on ...

 

In 200 years' time, if the question is asked on some futuristic game show "Name as many 20th-century Prime Ministers as possible" how many will the average contestant get? Quite possibly, only two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh yes there was Margaret Thatcher:gag:

 

History will record that Thatcher took a paralyzed, bankrupt, banana-republic economy and turned it into the fourth richest in the world. (It will, of course, also record that if any PM in the fifties, sixties and seventies had had the guts to take the necessary measures, they could have been achieved with perhaps 30,000 job losses, instead of three million...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

History will record that Thatcher took a paralyzed, bankrupt, banana-republic economy and turned it into the fourth richest in the world. (It will, of course, also record that if any PM in the fifties, sixties and seventies had had the guts to take the necessary measures, they could have been achieved with perhaps 30,000 job losses, instead of three million...)

 

OK i respect your way of thinking but i dont agree with it:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gordon Brown has already gone down in history as our worst PM ever. It'll be a long time before he loses that accolade.......................unless Milliband gets elected.

 

I suggest:

 

Neil Armstrong

Stephen Hawking

Steve Redgrave

Geoff Hurst

Eric Clapton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

History will record that Thatcher took a paralyzed, bankrupt, banana-republic economy and turned it into the fourth richest in the world. (It will, of course, also record that if any PM in the fifties, sixties and seventies had had the guts to take the necessary measures, they could have been achieved with perhaps 30,000 job losses, instead of three million...)

 

OK, well that's your take on things, do you not think it far more likely that in a few decades time the only fact anyone will remember about her is that she was the first female prime minister of this country?

 

There's enough people who'll write the history books with the opposite political slant to that which you have in order to muddy the waters on your points, the only thing everyone will be able to agree on is her gender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.