Jump to content

People alive today that will go down in history


Recommended Posts

History will record that Thatcher took a paralyzed, bankrupt, banana-republic economy and turned it into the fourth richest in the world. (It will, of course, also record that if any PM in the fifties, sixties and seventies had had the guts to take the necessary measures, they could have been achieved with perhaps 30,000 job losses, instead of three million...)

 

Yes, and she privatised everything too. A truly wonderful woman who really should have stayed in the kitchen making Dennis his tea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill Gates deserves a place in history for sure if he does manage to eliminate malaria, although it's a pretty tall order.

 

Bob Geldof and Richard Branson though? :gag:

 

well they are both Sirs so I guess they will go down in history

 

its not whether you like them or not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well they are both Sirs so I guess they will go down in history
?!? There have been hundreds (probably thousands) of 'sirs' whose names have been lost to history.

 

to think that they'll be household names or even noteworthy at all just because they've been given some disgusting dark-ages style title is pretty far fetched.

 

its not whether you like them or not
No, that's not why I don't think they'll 'go down in history' either.

 

It's because neither of them have done anything that will be worthy of note in the years to come.

 

Certainly not on the same level as trying to permanently rid the world of a disease which has caused immense suffering since the dawn of mankind, and pouring in hundreds of millions of your own personal wealth in order to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

History will record that Thatcher took a paralyzed, bankrupt, banana-republic economy and turned it into the fourth richest in the world. (It will, of course, also record that if any PM in the fifties, sixties and seventies had had the guts to take the necessary measures, they could have been achieved with perhaps 30,000 job losses, instead of three million...)

 

If she did that with that country, why did she run ours into the ground then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.