poppet2 Posted April 19, 2012 Author Share Posted April 19, 2012 It is the fact that there are some freehold flats on the market that surprise me. I could see problems occurring for example the following: a. If the freeholder of a flat lived in a block, but on the ground floor, would you still be expected to contribute towards the the cost of roof repairs? b. Ditto, for the lift, which if you live on the ground floor, would never use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 It is the fact that there are some freehold flats on the market that surprise me. I could see problems occurring for example the following: a. If the freeholder of a flat lived in a block, but on the ground floor, would you still be expected to contribute towards the the cost of roof repairs? b. Ditto, for the lift, which if you live on the ground floor, would never use. If the block's freeholder owns one flat not by lease, this would not detract from the rights of someone who owns another flat by lease. Generally, blocks of flats (inc. houses/commercial buildings converted into flats) involve a service charge that covers: a. block insurance; b. all structural parts; c. foundations (even for upper flats); d. roof (even for lower flats); and e. all external and internal common parts. Ground-floor flats' leases would usually exclude liability for that part of service charge as relates to a lift. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poppet2 Posted April 19, 2012 Author Share Posted April 19, 2012 Jeffrey, you're a star, and fast as lightning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.