sgtkate Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Something threateningly witty in a delightful way, I'm sure. Like her recent mention of a new study, which found that women who carry a little extra weight live longer than the men who mention it But then, she has very long-dating and full constructive notice that if either Ms Theriau or Ms Theron happened to walk into our place, she gets the settee You are assuming she wouldn't join in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleksandr Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 I voted yes. If I was single I would have no problem with dating someone who was bisexual. Why would I? jb Because they would be unsatisfied with just you as a sexual partner, and so you would have to share them with at least one other person. Not a problem for you maybe, but it would be for me! Did you interpret "date them" as "shag them"? That would be different. If it's casual or group sex you're after, then that would be absolutely fine. A bisexual person would be trapped in a relationship with just one other person, and would be unhappy. Unless... unless the other person were hermaphrodite, perhaps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin-H Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Because they would be unsatisfied with just you as a sexual partner, and so you would have to share them with at least one other person. Not a problem for you maybe, but it would be for me! Did you interpret "date them" as "shag them"? That would be different. If it's casual or group sex you're after, then that would be absolutely fine. A bisexual person would be trapped in a relationship with just one other person, and would be unhappy. Unless... unless the other person were hermaphrodite, perhaps. What? I think you misunderstand what a bisexual person is. It has nothing to do with them wanting to have more than one sexual partner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Arctor Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 It feels quite retro to be having this conversation at all to be honest. I thought we got over all this in the 90s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleksandr Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 What? I think you misunderstand what a bisexual person is. It has nothing to do with them wanting to have more than one sexual partner.Okay, sure, there are some bisexuals who chose to marry / partner-up with one person for life, but if they do that they must deny half their sexuality. It's not a recipe for a happiness. If they can be satisfied by one person of the same or the opposite sex, permanently, without feeling that they are missing out on something, then perhaps they are not truly bisexual. ---------- Post added 19-01-2017 at 23:29 ---------- It feels quite retro to be having this conversation at all to be honest. I thought we got over all this in the 90s It feels quite retro to be having this conversation at all to be honest. I thought we got over all this in the 90sNo. "Retro" would be finding something wrong with bisexuality. Saying that a bisexual person can be fully happy married (exclusively) to one other person is like saying that a heterosexual can be happy married to a person of the same sex, or that a homosexual can be married to a person of the opposite sex. Maybe that works for some of them, but a sexuality is something that needs to be fulfilled in order to achieve happiness. If someone fancies both men and women, they're going to be missing out with just the one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin-H Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Okay, sure, there are some bisexuals who chose to marry / partner-up with one person for life, but if they do that they must deny half their sexuality. It's not a recipe for a happiness. If they can be satisfied by one person of the same or the opposite sex, permanently, without feeling that they are missing out on something, then perhaps they are not truly bisexual. Again, I think you're somewhat confused. When anyone chooses to marry/parter-up with one person for life then they are choosing to not act on feelings they have for all other people that they might be attracted to. It doesn't matter if that is just one gender of people, or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleksandr Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 And like I say, it perhaps hinges on the definition of "dating". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECCOnoob Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Okay, sure, there are some bisexuals who chose to marry / partner-up with one person for life, but if they do that they must deny half their sexuality. It's not a recipe for a happiness. If they can be satisfied by one person of the same or the opposite sex, permanently, without feeling that they are missing out on something, then perhaps they are not truly bisexual. What in the name of jesus christ are you talking about. IF someone who is bisexual eventually meets a partner who they fall in love with and want to settle down with, that person could be of the same sex OR the opposite sex. Just like any other person you dont know who that special person will be until you meet them. Sometimes people never happen to meet "the one" That an apply to ANY sexuality Do you seriously think that being bisexual somehow has a mental deficiency that stops someone from settling down and truely having feelings for one person only??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleksandr Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Again, I think you're somewhat confused. When anyone chooses to marry/parter-up with one person for life then they are choosing to not act on feelings they have for all other people that they might be attracted to. It doesn't matter if that is just one gender of people, or two. Again, I think you are wrong about that. A woman doesn't have male parts, and vice versa, so if it's those parts that you fancy one night, then you can't have them! That must be difficult for some. Can you not see that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikki-red Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Again, I think you are wrong about that. A woman doesn't have male parts, and vice versa, so if it's those parts that you fancy one night, then you can't have them! That must be difficult for some. Can you not see that? Im fairly sure its not about the 'parts' but about the person. If youre a monogamous person its totally irrelevant if youre gay/straight or bi. A bisexual person is attracted to both sexes, its doesnt mean they NEED to be with both sexes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now