andygardener Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 Why not just add time on for lack of good behaviour instead of deducting time for good behaviour? "Good behaviour" means nothing of the sort. He just explained that. We can manage bad behaviour within the rules of the prison system withoput going to court. Quicker and cheaper. Like NH I also think the sentances are far too short but the basic principle of saving money and court time is a good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southcoast Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 That idiot BNP leader has given one of them grounds to launch a appeal,why couldn't he stop his tweeting till the outcome of the trial.What a complete idiot he is,no wonder the BNP are almost finished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 That idiot BNP leader has given one of them grounds to launch a appeal,why couldn't he stop his tweeting till the outcome of the trial.What a complete idiot he is,no wonder the BNP are almost finished. On the plus side, if it's established that he was privy to inside information from a juror, he might get sentenced for contempt of court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeMaquis Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 Why not just add time on for lack of good behaviour instead of deducting time for good behaviour? "Good behaviour" means nothing of the sort. In other words you'd punish someone for not doing something. Very bright idea. That would mean that the eventual sentence could be well out of proportion for the original crime. A thief could end up serving longer than a rapist. Prisoners get early release if they behave themselves, show remorse and are thought to not be a threat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southcoast Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 On the plus side, if it's established that he was privy to inside information from a juror, he might get sentenced for contempt of court. Yes that would be very good news,lets hope so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeMaquis Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 On the plus side, if it's established that he was privy to inside information from a juror, he might get sentenced for contempt of court. So might the juror. They could end up in the sex offenders wing for their own protection. Ironic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 On the plus side, if it's established that he was privy to inside information from a juror, he might get sentenced for contempt of court. It's probably not sensible Tweeting the outcome, just yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeX Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 Can anyone answer me this? Why is no one talking about deportation? Other countries do it. Why are we willing to allow such vile people to stay in the UK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 That idiot BNP leader has given one of them grounds to launch a appeal,why couldn't he stop his tweeting till the outcome of the trial.What a complete idiot he is,no wonder the BNP are almost finished. He had a wonderful opportunity to play the race card to his advantage and fouled it up. Hope that shows any BNP supporters how incompetent he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 Can anyone answer me this? Why is no one talking about deportation? Other countries do it. Why are we willing to allow such vile people to stay in the UK? They are, read the link to the BBC story, several have been given deportation orders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.