Magnese Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 It was an MI6- organised "Boston brakes" operation. Yes , indeed it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricgem2002 Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 Yes , indeed it was.:huh:why are you answering your own posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna B Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 I made a point of reading all the actual transcripts of the inquest. The impression that was given in the media bore no resemblance to the actual facts that came out. Particularly the evidence given by the ex MI5 man which was a travesty in the way it was reported. Let's not forget the outcome of the inquest was actually unlawful killing, a fact that is conveniently forgotten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnese Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 :huh:why are you answering your own posts I meant to edit it. It was a Boston brakes operation by the MI6 however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffragette1 Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 Oh dear! Why the 'oh dear'? Are you implying that she had a death wish or something? If you really believed that there were a serious threat to your life, would you not do everything possible to prevent such an eventuality? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnese Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 I made a point of reading all the actual transcripts of the inquest. The impression that was given in the media bore no resemblance to the actual facts that came out. Particularly the evidence given by the ex MI5 man which was a travesty in the way it was reported. Let's not forget the outcome of the inquest was actually unlawful killing, a fact that is conveniently forgotten. They are too bigoted to listen Anna. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricgem2002 Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 They are too bigoted to listen Anna. ok so why was she killed (ill play along with you ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffragette1 Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 OK, so to then summarise the facts. The royals disposed of a non-royal who was fast losing credibility and public support, as she was an embarrassment. Said act plunged to the royal family into the greatest constitutional crisis since Wallis Simpson appeared on the scene and Edward VIII abdicated. A woman who thought that her life was in danger and was about to be bumped off by the establishment in a car crash, gets into a limo driven by someone she barely knows, the car speeds through the streets of Paris and she decides not to wear her seatbelt, despite the fact that the body guard was, and she was advised to (I am sure that I read this somewhere). Hmmm. Yep, it sounds very plausible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnese Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 OK, so to then summarise the facts. The royals disposed of a non-royal who was fast losing credibility and public support, as she was an embarrassment. Said act plunged to the royal family into the greatest constitutional crisis since Wallis Simpson appeared on the scene and Edward VIII abdicated. A woman who thought that her life was in danger and was about up be bumped off by the establishment is a car crash, gets into a limo driven by someone she barely knows, the car speeds through the streets of Paris and she decides not to wear her seatbelt, despite the fact that the body guard was, and she was advised to (I am sure that I read this somewhere). Hmmm. Yep, it sounds very plausible. At least you realise that it sound plausible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 I made a point of reading all the actual transcripts of the inquest. The impression that was given in the media bore no resemblance to the actual facts that came out. Particularly the evidence given by the ex MI5 man which was a travesty in the way it was reported. Let's not forget the outcome of the inquest was actually unlawful killing, a fact that is conveniently forgotten. You conveniently forgot to add the rest of the verdict - "by the grossly negligent driving of chauffeur Henri Paul and following vehicles". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.