Eater Sundae Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 Yes , indeed it was. Yes, that adds credence to a post by Magnese. Now we will believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnese Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 Richard Coleman documented new evidence about the murder in April 2012. It was very damning new evidence which the powers that be chose to ignore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 Richard Coleman documented new evidence about the murder in April 2012. It was very damning new evidence which the powers that be chose to ignore Perhaps you could tell us what the evidence was? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnese Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 Yes, that adds credence to a post by Magnese. Now we will believe it. I am sure that you will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnese Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 Perhaps you could tell us what the evidence was? Google is your friend He may be your only friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricgem2002 Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 Google is your friend He may be your only friend. so why was she killed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffragette1 Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 Google is your friend He may be your only friend. The onus is on you to try and substantiate your argument that Diana was murdered. So what is this compelling and damning evidence then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 Google is your friend He may be your only friend. Is this the level of your debate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnese Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 The onus is on you to try and substantiate your argument that Diana was murdered. So what is this compelling and damning evidence then? The onus is on people who are interested in the truth to research it. If people are not interested then let them continue to be deluded. "Where ignorance is bliss tis folly to be wise":) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnese Posted May 20, 2012 Share Posted May 20, 2012 Is this the level of your debate? If you are not interested in the truth then do not bother . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.