Jump to content

New employment rules for dismissing underproductive staff. about time!!


Recommended Posts

The weather is too nice for me to trawl through 17 pages of this topic, but I will say this:

 

These 'rules' designed to (ho, ho) help the economy, are simply an excuse to sack highly-paid 'natives' and replace them with lower-paid immigrants.

 

Which will help the economy somewhat...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go too far in one direction we will have problems. Too far in the other direction problems too. It's about a balance and every country strives to achieve the balance that suits it best. Like I said most are somewhere in the centre of the spectrum. And that is reflected in the politics of the countries with the most advanced economies. Most major parties advocate an economy based on capitalist fundamentals with some socialist elements.

 

I don't disagree but personally I think the pendulum has swung much too far towards spending on nice to have but not essential social programmes. Not enough is done to create real, sustainable wealth. Gordon, worst man for the job, Brown failed to create real wealth and resorted to encouraging the banks to be reckless because he needed the tax revenue to squander on vanity projects to prop up his waning electoral support. He reduced unemployment by employing an extra 600,000 in the public sector.

 

Brown's was a particularly stupid brand of Socialism, just as we have in Sheffield, that spends extravagantly and actively deters any kind of wealth creation. That is why we are where we are. The problem for UK plc, and Sheffield, is that years of Labour mismanagement has created an expectation of something for nothing and it's going to be very difficult for any government trying to tackle that problem. Thatcher had the guts to try it but failed in the end. Cameron definitely doesn't have the guts. So we'll stagger on living beyond our means for a time and then it will all go horribly wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats the point of wealth creation if you dont spend it? as long as its spent wisely its all good. (spare me the the toe-curling examples of waste in recent years because I know all about it).

 

I think you understand the point that Labour stayed in power spending money that had not been earned. It had been borrowed. That has always been Labour's problem. Their promises are always bigger than their bank balances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you understand the point that Labour stayed in power spending money that had not been earned. It had been borrowed. That has always been Labour's problem. Their promises are always bigger than their bank balances.
does the condems printing money equate to the same :huh::hihi:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you understand the point that Labour stayed in power spending money that had not been earned. It had been borrowed. That has always been Labour's problem. Their promises are always bigger than their bank balances.

 

So why is borrowing up in the last two years since the unelected Disasterous Dave seized power? Why is he still flying around the world to get people to lend money on top of that already borrowed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So why is borrowing up in the last two years since the unelected Disasterous Dave seized power? Why is he still flying around the world to get people to lend money on top of that already borrowed?

 

Never tire of being wrong do you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.