Jim Graham Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 How embarrassing for you, Jim. The person to whom you refer has, since being sacked, become an author, a TV "talking head" and a parliamentary candidate. One could suggest that all those are as a consequence of his challenging "them". Don't you ever check your facts before posting? Nice try but what he has done since is completely irrelevant. He was sacked by twice sacked, champagne swilling, Chatsworth Estate dwelling, Murdoch money fleecing, philandering, Marxist (lol) firebrand and all round wretched Socialist sell out David Blunkett for telling the people the truth and embarrassing Blunkett and his department for their abject incompetence. I am very pleased he has gone on and done better but I bet he didn't think that at the time. He was treated disgracefully by the city's biggest disgrace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xenia Posted June 14, 2012 Share Posted June 14, 2012 How embarrassing for you, Jim. The person to whom you refer has, since being sacked, become an author, a TV "talking head" and a parliamentary candidate. One could suggest that all those are as a consequence of his challenging "them". Don't you ever check your facts before posting? Jim is in perfect control of the facts. The fact that this person has managed to resurrect his/her career is testement to thier tenacity and determination. What Blunkett and his gang did was reprehensible, typical of the socialist mafia that has infested this city for too long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saunaman Posted June 14, 2012 Author Share Posted June 14, 2012 On a more current note : so THAT's why the warm and cuddly Daily Mail have been banging on about paedophiles recently ! ( It is actually a very serious issue for all parents with young children and easily-led teenagers ). So which of the following 2 groups are the largest internet users :- (1)paedophiles (2) innocent hardworking ( or suffering unemployed ) decent people who are just worried about what is happening to this country , and who are frightened of what the future holds . Well I for one would feel my human rights were breached if G4S , sorry , the police , had the power to see what I was looking at on the internet . If they ever started monitoring my fetish for button-collecting , they might threaten to tell my employer about it if I didn't do ... whatever they asked . And I couldn't whistleblow about bad practice at work if I saw it - it would be P45 for me and a slow train towards WorkFare ! A Bullies' Charter , effectively ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockjaw Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 Nice try but what he has done since is completely irrelevant. I beg to differ. You said: Any employee who challenges them is driven out and loses their livelihood and future. Are you now saying that that is not true? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saunaman Posted June 16, 2012 Author Share Posted June 16, 2012 Why not look more closely at how the EU spends taxpayers money ? CAP subsidies over the last 10 years as follows : Tate and Lyle Europe 827,979,239 euros Nestle UK Ltd 196,777,997 euros Czarnikow Group Ltd 129,104,665 euros according to the "farmsubsidies.org/GB/ site Sorry but I thought my taxpayers' money was helping struggling farmers , stupid me for not realising that my taxes are funding big , multinational "junk food" companies ! STOOPID ME , must be a sheeeeeeepppp Since when have sheep demanded ETHICS , TRANSPARENCY , DEMOCRACY ? And then look at the kebab market ............... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucifer Posted June 16, 2012 Share Posted June 16, 2012 Would not have thought you old enough to go to the pub!.............have you finished your homework? Ooooooooooooh, that is cruel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saunaman Posted June 16, 2012 Author Share Posted June 16, 2012 Since when was cruelty something to be celebrated ? And by a dancing banana no less . Sorry , but the vast majority of people are actually quite decent . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Graham Posted June 16, 2012 Share Posted June 16, 2012 I beg to differ. You said: Are you now saying that that is not true? Oh dear, did I forget rule one of the Pedant's Charter: "Never assume your audience can understand the written word without copious and mindnumbingly tedious explanatory notes"? So to clarify my point for those desperately trying and failing to criticise: Any employee who challenges them is driven out and loses their livelihood and future in that organisation and/or industry, business or similar sector of the working environment for which they may have trained, and paid a lot of hard earned money, for years to get into and had, thereby, invested a great deal of their life to be a part of. Frankly, anyone defending the actions of the digusting Blunkett needs to take a very hard look at their moral values. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockjaw Posted June 16, 2012 Share Posted June 16, 2012 Oh dear, did I forget rule one of the Pedant's Charter: "Never assume your audience can understand the written word without copious and mindnumbingly tedious explanatory notes"? So to clarify my point for those desperately trying and failing to criticise: Any employee who challenges them is driven out and loses their livelihood and future in that organisation and/or industry, business or similar sector of the working environment for which they may have trained, and paid a lot of hard earned money, for years to get into and had, thereby, invested a great deal of their life to be a part of. Frankly, anyone defending the actions of the digusting Blunkett needs to take a very hard look at their moral values. Remarkable! Because I point out yet another of your glib, unfounded fallacies I'm a Blunkett fan? You are madder than I previously estimated. Oh, and: Rule one of the argument loser's charter: Accuse the person who has shown you to be wrong of "pedantry". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadingNorth Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Remarkable! Because I point out yet another of your glib, unfounded fallacies I'm a Blunkett fan? What fallacy? He was telling the truth. The guy he's talking about was indeed driven out, and did indeed lose his career and livelihood. That's why he had to go and make a new one, as a talking head, author and parliamentary candidate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.