quisquose Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 George Takei has just shared this photo on his Facebook page today: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=493016327394492&set=a.223098324386295.105971.205344452828349&type=1&theater Nice one George. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 When you find what you are looking for in the scriptures, what will your reaction be then? Will you declare that God is man-made, making all such laws irrelevant, or will you state that you don't believe in a God anyway? In either case it seems pointless asking for scriptural evidence. To be fair a supra-natural all powerful being that created the universe then made one particular species of creature out of millions and then forgot to lose the foreskin and instead of just using it's powers made everyone's dad who who didn't chop that bit off a sinner would be a really rubbish supreme being. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomdido Posted July 12, 2012 Author Share Posted July 12, 2012 All i can say is, it's a real snip:hihi: Do I need to explain why this attempted play on words fails? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 To be fair a supra-natural all powerful being that created the universe then made one particular species of creature out of millions and then forgot to lose the foreskin and instead of just using it's powers made everyone's dad who who didn't chop that bit off a sinner would be a really rubbish supreme being. You should have added, but only passed on the message to a very low percentage of that species. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodStar Posted July 13, 2012 Share Posted July 13, 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18793842 Germany bans it......are they picking on the Jews again? The Courts ruling- Circumcision that is not medically necessary is: An assault Conflicts with child's right to decide religion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucifer Posted July 14, 2012 Share Posted July 14, 2012 That's what I've heard. Is circumcision a monumental **** up ?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poppet2 Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 (edited) There was an interview on Radio 4 this morning about 8.50am. The Rabbi who was interviewed re. circumcision revealed that all the Queen's son's had been circumcised. Even John Humphries was surprised at that news. Edited July 19, 2012 by poppet2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubydazzler Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 There was an interview on Radio 4 this morning about 8.50am. The Rabbi who was interviewed re. circumcision revealed that all the Queen's son's had been circumcised. Even John Humphries was surprised at that news.Jeeze, that's disgraceful - are the poor sods to be allowed no privacy at all. Although I don't want to appear unduly prying into their private life, it'd be interesting to know if Charles and Edward decided to have their sons done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 (edited) Jeeze, that's disgraceful - are the poor sods to be allowed no privacy at all. Although I don't want to appear unduly prying into their private life, it'd be interesting to know if Charles and Edward decided to have their sons done. The Chopping of Charles was published at the time. Humphries should have his salary cut for showing his ignorance. Diana's views meant that William and Harry were left intact. There is suggestion that they were asked to follow tradition after their mother's demise. There is photographic evidence on the web that shows an intact William having an alfresco wazz at a polo competition. Edited July 19, 2012 by cgksheff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubydazzler Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 The Chopping of Charles was published at the time. Humphries should have his salary cut for showing his ignorance. Diana's views meant that William and Harry were left intact. There is suggestion that they were asked to follow tradition after their mother's demise. There is photographic evidence on the web that shows an intact William having an alfresco wazz at a polo competition. I'm now wondering about Philip. I didn't want these images in my head ... Anyway, it's a fad that seems to have run its course, amongst 'Gentiles', at least. Happily for the baby boys of the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now