Mecky Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 But people just read the headline, which is based on someone's assumption - an assumption to fit their biased agenda. But there are always two sides to an argument Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 200 school playing fields were sold off under Labour. A Labour councillor on Sky News last night was complaining about the latest sell off, the Sky News presenter gave her these facts but all she could reply with was "Yes, but the Tories did it before 1997". She couldn't and wouldn't answer why Labour followed the Tories, and that sums them up perfectly. It's almost as bad as lying about the number of playing fields sold off isn't it? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19291911 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 It's almost as bad as lying about the number of playing fields sold off isn't it? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19291911 Who's lying? They were given incorrect data. There's no evidence of a lie in your link - just your assumption, which takes us nicely back to my earlier post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 The cost of property rental fell over the period 2009 to 2011, but the market is 'recovering' now.. Really? The BBC says otherwise for 2010: Home rental costs 'continue to rise'- 19 November 2010 Frustrated buyers are continuing to push up the price of renting a property in the UK, according to a survey. The average cost rose for the ninth consecutive month to £691 a month in October, according to LSL Property Services. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11791358 It really would help your arguments if you posted some links to your wild claims to have at least some credibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Who's lying? They were given incorrect data. There's no evidence of a lie in your link - just your assumption, which takes us nicely back to my earlier post. And by the same token you can't say that it wasn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 And by the same token you can't say that it wasn't. You're the one who's saying it's a lie..it's up to you to prove it surely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 And by the same token you can't say that it wasn't. The government apologise for being given the wrong data, and don't say it's a lie. The BBC don't say it's a lie. Neither do the other major news sources. But you do. You with an agenda to attack the coalition and most of my posts whenever you can (but oddly enough you disappear when proven wrong). Hmmmm, which one to believe............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossyrooney Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I think the proof lies in the fact that he opened his mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossyrooney Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 The government apologise for being given the wrong data, and don't say it's a lie. The BBC don't say it's a lie. Neither do the other major news sources. But you do. You with an agenda to attack the coalition and most of my posts whenever you can (but oddly enough you disappear when proven wrong). Hmmmm, which one to believe............. Mecky :hihi: Soz matey,but you did ask for it...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Who's lying? They were given incorrect data. There's no evidence of a lie in your link - just your assumption, which takes us nicely back to my earlier post. Given incorrect data probably by the same civil servants that did it for Labour too....oh,what am I talking about they never gave out erroneous info ,sorry lied, did they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.