Tom Bailey Posted August 21, 2012 Author Share Posted August 21, 2012 I'd be happy if everyone paid what they legally have to...I take it from your reply that's all you do...? So you're happy with the current system that allows the upper echelon to avoid paying tax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Bailey Posted August 21, 2012 Author Share Posted August 21, 2012 I have no idea; but he escaped the country yet was not on the HMRC Name/Shame list. He returned voluntarily, as I think you know. That's imaterial, Nadir had far more bad publicity than the 200 on the list yet you think he had a fair trial whilst the little fish wouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 That's imaterial, Nadir had far more bad publicity than the 200 on the list yet you think he had a fair trial whilst the little fish wouldn't. No. He thought that he'd receive- and, I guess, now thinks that he's had- a fair trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Bailey Posted August 21, 2012 Author Share Posted August 21, 2012 No. He thought that he'd receive- and, I guess, now thinks that he's had- a fair trial. So considering the massive negative publicity he'd had down the years he got a fair trial but those obscure few won't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 So you're happy with the current system that allows the upper echelon to avoid paying tax. I've already answered you question..will you answer mine...Do you pay more than you legally need to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 So considering the massive negative publicity he'd had down the years he got a fair trial but those obscure few won't. I doubt that they would, but that's best for them to argue: if they return voluntarily, as he did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Bailey Posted August 21, 2012 Author Share Posted August 21, 2012 I doubt that they would, but that's best for them to argue: if they return voluntarily, as he did. Well as I said I think he's had far more negative publicity than they've had, most people have foregotten it already but Nadir was a high profile figure who was kept in the public eye.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Bailey Posted August 21, 2012 Author Share Posted August 21, 2012 I've already answered you question..will you answer mine...Do you pay more than you legally need to? That is immaterial, you're just playing into the governments hands by looking at the small fry whilst you're happy to let the whale get away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 That is immaterial, you're just playing into the governments hands by looking at the small fry whilst you're happy to let the whale get away. It's not immaterial at all...do you pay more tax than you legally have to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Bailey Posted August 22, 2012 Author Share Posted August 22, 2012 It's not immaterial at all...do you pay more tax than you legally have to? Of course it's immaterial, the smokescreen is there to take attention away from the real cost to the economy which is those at the top who benefit from an outdated immoral UK tax system and you walked right into the smokescreen. The government must be clapping their hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.