Jump to content

Take social housing away from rich areas


Recommended Posts

but you would send the unemployed there:huh: what if they had families here ?

 

They can get their benefits anywhere and many people move away from family to find work, so moving away to get a free house and benefits shouldn’t be an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can get their benefits anywhere and many people move away from family to find work, so moving away to get a free house and benefits shouldn’t be an issue.
but it would be an issue . people being unemployed usually really on family/friends etc to help out.would you want the same for your kids if they became unemployed ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

but it would be an issue . people being unemployed usually really on family/friends etc to help out.would you want the same for your kids if they became unemployed ?

 

They wouldn't need a free house so it wouldn't be an issue; the unemployed you are talking about could always stay at home with mum and dad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the only country in the world where people are given free housing, lighting, heating, healthcare and cash in hand and feel entitled. Polish people I meet in particular are amazed at this.

 

The working poor who suffer brief periods of unemployment deserve assistance and help in staying in the community in which they work. Those who are unemployed for years, particularly those who stayed on the dole during the long 93 -07 boom deserve only the most meagre subsistence to ensure their minimum rights are met. Those people should be sent wherever it is convenient for councils and the taxpayer. If you contribute zero to society but cost it hundreds of thousands a year for years then why should you have any choice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the only country in the world where people are given free housing, lighting, heating, healthcare and cash in hand and feel entitled. Polish people I meet in particular are amazed at this.

 

The working poor who suffer brief periods of unemployment deserve assistance and help in staying in the community in which they work. Those who are unemployed for years, particularly those who stayed on the dole during the long 93 -07 boom deserve only the most meagre subsistence to ensure their minimum rights are met. Those people should be sent wherever it is convenient for councils and the taxpayer. If you contribute zero to society but cost it hundreds of thousands a year for years then why should you have any choice?

 

I agree entirley,

 

It’s also one of the reason people travel to the UK, what we are entitled to, they are entitled too, if we go to their country we are also entitled to what they get, which is usually sod all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what if mum and dad didnt have the room ?( because you also took their 3 bedroomed house off them ):hihi::hihi::hihi:

 

Why would anyone take their house off them, if mum and dad don't work and get a free house, and their kids don't work then it’s cheaper to keep them all under one roof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would anyone take their house off them, if mum and dad don't work and get a free house, and their kids don't work then it’s cheaper to keep them all under one roof.
you have said previously that someone single living in a 3 bedroomed house should not have it ? that to me says you would take it off them :huh:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.