Cyclone Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 How did you draw the conclusion that I was perfect? Seriously, it's a crime to drive across the footpath where there isn't a drop curb, people do get prosecuted for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMorris Posted August 28, 2012 Author Share Posted August 28, 2012 How did you draw the conclusion that I was perfect? Seriously, it's a crime to drive across the footpath where there isn't a drop curb, people do get prosecuted for it. But it's hardly relevant is it?....I drove up a drop kerb, and I didn't get prosecuted for driving on the footpath...so what relevance is your post? People get prosecuted for murder, but I didn't do that either! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMorris Posted August 28, 2012 Author Share Posted August 28, 2012 How did you draw the conclusion that I was perfect? Because you criticise me for some misdemeanor and say I ought to have been prosecuted with other offences too! What makes you so rightious? The only conclusion I can assume is because you've never done anything wrong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 I don't think I used the word "ought". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMorris Posted August 28, 2012 Author Share Posted August 28, 2012 I don't think I used the word "ought". Pointless arguing semantics with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 You appear to be parked on the footpath? Yep. He does. Double-yellow lines are double yellow lines. And yes, the restrictions apply from the lines, across the pavement to the line of the building/ wall. The car is not exactly an obstruction, true, but it's contravening the Double-yellas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 Pointless arguing semantics with you. It's hardly semantics, you've read something entirely different to what was written. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMorris Posted August 28, 2012 Author Share Posted August 28, 2012 It's hardly semantics, you've read something entirely different to what was written. Ok...you're superior....we got that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMorris Posted August 28, 2012 Author Share Posted August 28, 2012 Yep. He does. Double-yellow lines are double yellow lines. And yes, the restrictions apply from the lines, across the pavement to the line of the building/ wall. The car is not exactly an obstruction, true, but it's contravening the Double-yellas. So where has this sign gone?...Bugger the link doesn't seem to work now! The link in I think post 26 where biotechpete posted a link from google! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghozer Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 I have other pictures which I took at the time which clearly show the post and the sign isn't there. If it was/is a permit holder only parking area, then presumably it is/was perfectly reasonable to park there (with a permit), therefore it's not causing an obstruction or endangering anyone. I seem to be made out to be some sort of monster, because I parked in what I thought to be a perfectly acceptable safe place to park! *sigh* As I said, I wasn't talking about the sign at all, since it isn't there any more, I was talking with regards to positioning against the road, junctions, and other things.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.