Plain Talker Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Does that apply to ''cartoons'' ? Whats the law regarding ''Teddy Bears'' being named Mohammed ? 1) Yes the pornography law applies to photographs, cartoons and "pseudo photographs".. 2) Was the teddy under-age, and depicted in a pornographic image? If not, then it's of no relevance to the Pornography laws.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMoran Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 1) Yes the pornography law applies to photographs, cartoons and "pseudo photographs".. 2) Was the teddy under-age, and depicted in a pornographic image? If not, then it's of no relevance to the Pornography laws.. From memory a teacher was sentenced to death for naming a teddy bear mohamed Which turned out to be at the request of one of her students. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OPEN BORDERS Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 1) Yes the pornography law applies to photographs, cartoons and "pseudo photographs".. 2) Was the teddy under-age, and depicted in a pornographic image? If not, then it's of no relevance to the Pornography laws.. I dont think the Teddy was under age. However, should a womans life be threatened because she gave it the name Mohammed ? Remember, its 2012. Not the 7th century when the queran was wrote. Times change ! The Western world has anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted October 7, 2012 Author Share Posted October 7, 2012 I dont think the Teddy was under age. However, should a womans life be threatened because she gave it the name Mohammed ? Remember, its 2012. Not the 7th century when the queran was wrote. Times change ! The Western world has anyway. Of course not, but you know what? Should someone's life be threatened because they're a different colour, religion, sex, sexuality? I've even seen grown men threaten the lives of other men because they support a different football team...all in the 'Western world'! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OPEN BORDERS Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Of course not, but you know what? Should someone's life be threatened because they're a different colour, religion, sex, sexuality? I've even seen grown men threaten the lives of other men because they support a different football team...all in the 'Western world'! Never known football hooligans behead eachother and post it on the web ! Should i go on - no ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OPEN BORDERS Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Stop defending the indefensible B.F.. Its 2012, the age of modern technology. People will post silly, hurtul things WORLDWIDE ! In an instant. Islam and its followers need to calm down, relax. The more they protest, the more people will post such things. This constant conflict, will eventually become very serious. Im concerned for both Muslims, Christians and all other faiths. Religion in my opinion is way, way outdated. Lets not let it worry us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMoran Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Of course not, but you know what? Should someone's life be threatened because they're a different colour, religion, sex, sexuality? I've even seen grown men threaten the lives of other men because they support a different football team...all in the 'Western world'! :hihi::hihi: You ever thought of being an mp BF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted October 7, 2012 Author Share Posted October 7, 2012 Stop defending the indefensible B.F.. Its 2012, the age of modern technology. People will post silly, hurtul things WORLDWIDE ! In an instant. Islam and its followers need to calm down, relax. The more they protest, the more people will post such things. This constant conflict, will eventually become very serious. Im concerned for both Muslims, Christians and all other faiths. Religion in my opinion is way, way outdated. Lets not let it worry us. Could you point out what it is you believe I'm 'defending'? In cases of extremism have you never wondered what the common demoninator is? It's the man, in mankind. It don't matter what colour, religion he is or indeed what football team he supports-he wants to dominate and subjugate others..that was my point. Muslim extremists are no better (or worse) than any other group of people who believe through their affiliation that they're superior to someone else. So rather than say I'm defending anything why not look at the bigger picture and ask yourself why Muslims should be singled out for special treatment..if you want to do Christian extremists, I'll bore you to death about the Westboro Baptists, or the likes of David Copeland or those who murder doctors who work in abortion clinics..no better, or worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted October 7, 2012 Author Share Posted October 7, 2012 :hihi::hihi: You ever thought of being an mp BF? I have in fact, but the BNP has no affection for darkies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyfriday Posted October 7, 2012 Author Share Posted October 7, 2012 Never known football hooligans behead eachother and post it on the web ! Should i go on - no ! But you've heard accounts of football fans murdering each other, having pitched battles, intimidating members of the public? Went on for years. You should stop defending the indefensible (to coin phrase), OB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.