Jump to content

Apart from wear and tear, could this be construed as perpetual motion?


Recommended Posts

It might be, but over time it does add up of course, proving that the Moon and tides are extracting energy from the Earth's angular momentum. If you go bakc and look at corals from the seas back in the Devonian you see that they have growth bands for each day of growth and a year band over the course of the seasons, and they have something like 400 days in a year. The length of the year hasn't changed but the length of the day certainly has.

 

Yes but we are talking of probably billions of years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but we are talking of probably billions of years!

 

To be honest Pete, billions of years is a long time (for us), but a mere scratch on perpetuity.

How do you measure 'forever' anyway? If time starts at when the universe began, surely it must end when it finishes? Is this forever? :huh:

This is all stuff that we don't know about, or get our heads round as it transcends our known perceived laws of science.

Who's to say that perpetual motion doesn't exist ... could it exist sub-atomically in processes we're only just discovering?

 

Although we think we know a lot, we don't actually know what's at the bottom of our own oceans!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but we are talking of probably billions of years!

 

400 million or so. Not that long, when you consider the timespan of the Universe.

 

incidentally if we ever seriously used tidal power, that's where would be tapping the energy from - the more tidal power we use the more the Earth slows down. Not truly renewable and one to use to wind up the greenies if you feel that way inclined :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest Pete, billions of years is a long time (for us), but a mere scratch on perpetuity.

How do you measure 'forever' anyway? If time starts at when the universe began, surely it must end when it finishes? Is this forever? :huh:

This is all stuff that we don't know about, or get our heads round as it transcends our known perceived laws of science.

Who's to say that perpetual motion doesn't exist ... could it exist sub-atomically in processes we're only just discovering?

 

Although we think we know a lot, we don't actually know what's at the bottom of our own oceans!

 

I don't know if it's a 'truism' or not, but if we made a huge list of things we 'do' know about, we could probably make a longer list of stuff we don't know about!..AND..That wouldn't include stuff we don't know about! :huh:

 

At least that's what I think I mean! :hihi:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.