Jump to content

Should plebs be allowed to protect their homes if behind with the rent?


Recommended Posts

Thanks I did know the spelling but there is always someone to lure with a mispelling

"A day in the life of Denis O'vich"

 

That's the one! ... I'll let you off this time! :D

Anyway ... Gulag archipelagos aren't a very nice place to live, if you take his word for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seconded-the comments are from a person shielded from the real world,a person who can indulge in flippancy,who has probably inherited wealth and never worked.

 

Might I venture that perhaps someones got a broken sarcasm meter though... You might want to get it serviced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-19879314

 

 

 

This is all good for non-mortgaged-owner-occupiers and people in front with the rent and council tax, but what about plebs?

 

Suppose somebody is behind with the rent, or has missed a mortgage payment, or perhaps is behind with council tax. Many would say they do not even have a right to be in "their" home.

 

Should people behind with the rent/mortgage/council tax be allowed to protect their dwellings/abode?

 

No. Kick them out. A property owner who rents out still has to pay all the costs he's obligated to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.