MrMoran Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 I'm afraid I dozed off watching the Gillard 'performance'.! It was a bit dull. Her voice dunt half grate after a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janie48 Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 It was a bit dull. Her voice dunt half grate after a while. Can't see why the voice should have anything to do with the content of the speech,and the valid points raised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMorris Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 It was a bit dull. Her voice dunt half grate after a while. That's why I nodded off (metaphorically)....I turned it off before she must have got to the 'good' bits! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessica23 Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 Not often speeches made in parliament end up with the lexicographers changing the dictionary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retep Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 I see your sides are splitting again. Looks like Julia fell about laughing, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2218930/Julia-Gillard-brought-heel---Australian-PM-takes-tumble-laying-wreath-Gandhis-grave.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 It was a bit dull. Her voice dunt half grate after a while. That's why I nodded off (metaphorically)....I turned it off before she must have got to the 'good' bits! What did you expect or think you may have missed? Did you expect her to deliver her speech wearing nipple tassels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMorris Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 What did you expect or think you may have missed? Did you expect her to deliver her speech wearing nipple tassels. Well yes that would have held my attention briefly. I think it's called charisma. She didn't hold my attention!...No big deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 Can't see why the voice should have anything to do with the content of the speech,and the valid points raised. Correct, It has nothing to do with the content, unless you take Gillard's attack personally. Which is a misogynists dead giveaway, clearly demonstrated by the dim already posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMorris Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 Correct, It has nothing to do with the content, unless you take Gillard's attack personally. Which is a misogynists dead giveaway, clearly demonstrated by the dim already posting. I didn't get that far into the speech. That makes me dim I suppose! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hots on Posted October 17, 2012 Share Posted October 17, 2012 She's right to speak out against misogyny, but she, and her kindred spirit here, Harriet Harmann, do take the man-hating a bit too far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.