MrMoran Posted October 18, 2012 Author Share Posted October 18, 2012 If you are caught with a taser in your possession then you will probably be charged with an offence under S5 of the Firearms Act (1968 ) If - as Sir Robert Peel said in Principle 7 - “... the police are the public and the public are the police" then why is a policeman who uses a taser against anybody at any time not suspended from duty and the incident subjected to a full enquiry? To put it bluntly, dibble is above the law. Peel will be spinning in his grave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 That's because I have a life, now I'm back from the pub I see you sads are still rambling on. Enjoy, I'm bored with 'debating' thickies. Ah yes. I always thought that Goldfinger was the best bond villian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMoran Posted October 18, 2012 Author Share Posted October 18, 2012 Ah yes. I always thought that Goldfinger was the best bond villian. Odd Job for me but then i do have a bowel complaint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxmaximus Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 "It then became apparent this man was not the person we were looking for and officers attended to him straight away" Are they saying there actually WAS a swordsman somewhere but they had got the wrong man? Yes and he was arrested shortly after. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Vader Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 If you are caught with a taser in your possession then you will probably be charged with an offence under S5 of the Firearms Act (1968 ) If - as Sir Robert Peel said in Principle 7 - “... the police are the public and the public are the police" then why is a policeman who uses a taser against anybody at any time not suspended from duty and the incident subjected to a full enquiry? Yes, it brings to mind the Mitchell fiasco - if he'd have said it to ANYONE else, they'd have no comeback, but the police are not equal in the eyes of the law, obviously. Next time we're swore at, we should phone the police, and ask them to come and take statements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMoran Posted October 18, 2012 Author Share Posted October 18, 2012 Yes, it brings to mind the Mitchell fiasco - if he'd have said it to ANYONE else, they'd have no comeback, but the police are not equal in the eyes of the law, obviously. Next time we're swore at, we should phone the police, and ask them to come and take statements. What if its the police doing the swearing? Who you gonna call? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWOL Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I am sure that the blind man took it in good faith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathAxe Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 Dont taser me bro! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bypassblade Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 What if its the police doing the swearing? Who you gonna call? Crimebusters (play Ghostbusters theme) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMoran Posted October 18, 2012 Author Share Posted October 18, 2012 Dont taser me bro! Why are you a blind, innocent member of the public going about your lawful business? If yes then id worry. Then after your tasering and beating you can rest assured that lessons will be learned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.