I1L2T3 Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Which papers are they? Are you having a laugh? Go and find out for yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 I'm not sure that Rupert was attempting to defend Conrod TBH... He might have been trying to explain how Conrod came up with his, let's be charitable, odd ideas, but I don't read it as a defence per se. Ok, maybe it wasn't an outright defence but it's the closest Conrod has got to somebody agreeing. I still think it's one of the funniest posts on here this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 There is that I suppose. How would you fix it? I don't imagine for a moment that Phan believes your 'brave new world' should be - as you cleverly put it - fixed. I daresay he'll make his view known in due course. I certainly don't, it's a repellent idea to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 Are you having a laugh? Go and find out for yourself.Ah, so you can't provide any. That's fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 This isn't about papers, it's about humanity, or the lack of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 Ok, maybe it wasn't an outright defence but it's the closest Conrod has got to somebody agreeing. I still think it's one of the funniest posts on here this year. I'll have you know that it's not easy being so much smarter than those around you, at times it's rather frustrating. RB perhaps just understands this better than most; most posters are fortunte not to have such concerns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 This isn't about papers, it's about humanity, or the lack of it.Or human gene quality, or the lack of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Ah, so you can't provide any. That's fine. Actually in this case I don't think I have to. You started the thread. It's about your ideas. They're so comprehensively ill-founded as proven by so many posters on this thread that the onus is on you to back yourself up. First you need to start by understanding evolutionary theories better. Then come back and explain why they are wrong and you are right. For somebody with such a high IQ it shouldn't be an issue for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Or human gene quality, or the lack of it. The term as you use it is utterly unscientific and wholly subjective. You should just be honest and say it's about groups of people you don't like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 Actually in this case I don't think I have to. You started the thread. It's about your ideas. They're so comprehensively ill-founded as proven by so many posters on this thread that the onus is on you to back yourself up. First you need to start by understanding evolutionary theories better. Then come back and explain why they are wrong and you are right. For somebody with such a high IQ it shouldn't be an issue for you.Oh, I do understand, and nobody has 'proven' anything. Must say, not a bad attempt to divert from your inability to link to the papers you claim exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.