Alien52 Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 Why not bury him below my flats, I would earn a fortune from the tourist board. It would soon become the tourist bored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEDROCK Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 I wonder what his head stone will read... Here lays the body of Richard III Amassed great wealth and power - Ruler of lands and holder of titles - Winner of countless enemy encounters - Only to be buried in a car park in Leicester centuries later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien52 Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 I wonder what his head stone will read... Here lays the body of Richard III Amassed great wealth and power - Ruler of lands and holder of titles - Winner of countless enemy encounters - Only to be buried in a car park in Leicester centuries later. I suspect he will have been buried quite soon after the events of August 1485. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johncocker Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Was that during the Winter of discontent. no, it was during his" discount of winter tents" he used to have a army disposal stores before he got into writing " willy wobble daggers discounts "I think it was called:suspect: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harleyman Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 (edited) Much of the "evil hunchback" image of Richard the Third can be attributed to William Shakepeare but it has to be remembered that Shakespeare lived in the Tudor period and this could very well have influenced his thinking and attitude Edited February 6, 2013 by Harleyman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janie48 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 no, it was during his" discount of winter tents" he used to have a army disposal stores before he got into writing " willy wobble daggers discounts "I think it was called:suspect: Much of the "evil hunchback" image of Richard the Third can be attributed to William Shakepeare but it has to be remembered that Shakespeare lived in the Tudor period and this could very well have influenced his thinking and attitude So Shakespeare apparently got it wrong,Richard wasn't evil after all. So who murdered the two princes? It appears that the mystery is never going to be solved. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2274247/Richard-III-unearthed-princes-tower-stay-buried.html#axzz2Jwem6UWJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEDROCK Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Is it just me, or has everyone been staggered by not one of the royal family have come forward to provide DNA, absolutely insane. I say our current crop of royal family is just a bunch of free loading imposters, they have no right to be where they are. For the person that came forward to provide DNA for Richard III, surely they should be next in line to the throne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waldo Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Seriously what does it matter? It matters a great deal, when you consider all the tourists who will visit whatever-town to check out his final resting place. Surely that's what all the hub hub is actually about? (tourist dolla) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mapleboy Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 I wonder what his head stone will read... Here lays the body of Richard III Amassed great wealth and power - Ruler of lands and holder of titles - Winner of countless enemy encounters - Only to be buried in a car park in Leicester centuries later. You missed one: Owes a kings ransom in unpaid parking fines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Is it just me, or has everyone been staggered by not one of the royal family have come forward to provide DNA, absolutely insane. I say our current crop of royal family is just a bunch of free loading imposters, they have no right to be where they are. For the person that came forward to provide DNA for Richard III, surely they should be next in line to the throne. Why would the current Royal Family offer their DNA when they are not related to Richard III? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now