stevie1957 Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 It seems my previous posts responding to you have been removed. For what reason I'm not sure. I have no way of debating anything with you. You have an unfair advantage. I feel the same way as you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevie1957 Posted April 14, 2012 Share Posted April 14, 2012 That would be me. In response to a whole selection of reports. Nothing in my posts was inflammatory. Unless you think commenting on Abu Hamza inciting mass murder and his vile racist speeches as fascistic being inflammatory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xenia Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 And yet Charles Bronson has served nearly all his extended sentence in that way ,nothings said about that even though he didn't encourage murder or terrorism He has committed further offences whilst in custody and is serving appropriae sentences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medusa Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Nothing in my posts was inflammatory. Unless you think commenting on Abu Hamza inciting mass murder and his vile racist speeches as fascistic being inflammatory. If a post quotes or answers a post which was removed then it needs to be removed too. 38 posts were removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevie1957 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 If a post quotes or answers a post which was removed then it needs to be removed too. 38 posts were removed. Thank you for explaining have it works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANGELFIRE1 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Thank you for explaining have it works. If a post quotes or answers a post which was removed then it needs to be removed too. 38 posts were removed. Makes the topic hard to follow and understand though. As for the filth that is Abu Hamza, he should be overseas and languishing in a prison cell by now. As for his human rights, he does not have any - he is sub human. Angel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamrocker Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 He has committed further offences whilst in custody and is serving appropriae sentences. And serving them in solitary ? Bronson scares the system simply because he refuses to bend and give in the, "offenses" he has committed inside are a load of rubbish,if you dont understand the way these so called offenses are investigated inside you will not understand.Inside the old saying is reversed you are guilty until proven innocent and the system has full control over any investigation and punishment so proving innocence is very very hard ..anyway this thread is not about Bronson so we'll leave it at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hard2miss Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Indeed. There's a tendency to lose feet, not hands, when standing on a landmine. Next the claim will be he was walking on his hands at the time, in which case he should now look like a coat hanger with a hook for an head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xenia Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 And serving them in solitary ? Bronson scares the system simply because he refuses to bend and give in the, "offenses" he has committed inside are a load of rubbish,if you dont understand the way these so called offenses are investigated inside you will not understand.Inside the old saying is reversed you are guilty until proven innocent and the system has full control over any investigation and punishment so proving innocence is very very hard ..anyway this thread is not about Bronson so we'll leave it at that. Quite happy to leave it at that, but the fact remains that this coutry does not incarcerate people without due process of law. Bronson is a thug, who, if released, would soon commit further offences. Until he reforms and stops committing offences whilst in custody he should stay there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidney Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Quite happy to leave it at that, but the fact remains that this coutry does not incarcerate people without due process of law. Bronson is a thug, who, if released, would soon commit further offences. Until he reforms and stops committing offences whilst in custody he should stay there. The best way to stop people offending is not always by giving them tough prison sentences. Watch "A Sense Of Freedom" about the life of Jimmy Boyle... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.