LeMaquis Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 ...maybe if they had found a sensible leader to direct them they could have had a say in matters ,as it is they will never lose the thuggish accolades they have striven so easily to attain .... A sensible leader? Attain thuggish accolades? The BNP was founded by John Tyndall who was imprisoned twenty years earlier for setting up a paramilitary organisation modelled on Hitler's SA. The BNP was set up to kick its way to power. There is no such thing as sensible fascism and no sensible person would join the BNP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 In the interest of balance, fairness and transparency, I'd like to point everyone to the result of the Nether Edge council election result 2012.. Just so that we all know where Jeffrey is coming from. As for UKIP having any policies other than their well known stance on immigration, they do. Most of them seem to revolve around getting into a time machine and setting course for 1952. And what would be so bad about skipping back to an age when people understood social responsibility, respected authority, and wanted to work for a living? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sibon Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 And what would be so bad about skipping back to an age when people understood social responsibility, respected authority, and wanted to work for a living? Which decade would you prefer to live in. This one, or the fifties? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conrod Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Which decade would you prefer to live in. This one, or the fifties? With our current comforts and techonlogy, I'd be happy to apply 50's laws and morals. Very happy. Given an absolute choice between the two . . .well, there were still cars and bikes, guns, music, and women, so what else can man need? And things were all more 'English', so between the two, I'd rather go back 60 years than face the rot of society that socialism and multiculturalism have created today. Aside from anything else, I'd make a fortune on the stock market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamrocker Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 A sensible leader? Attain thuggish accolades? The BNP was founded by John Tyndall who was imprisoned twenty years earlier for setting up a paramilitary organisation modelled on Hitler's SA. The BNP was set up to kick its way to power. There is no such thing as sensible fascism and no sensible person would join the BNP. again the gospel according to Sp Lemaquis ,if you are anti immigration or anti muslim you must be racist and fascist change the record or at least take notice of the posts,Tyndall founded the BNP but obviously they sought a new leader otherwise Griffin wouldnt now be in that position now just suppose they had found someone to take them down different road but still under the banner of the BNP,I know its asking a lot of your paranoiac mind to take in but if the said leader were to drop the thuggishness and its devotees and contrive to make the BNP into a valid party which objects to unopposed immigration would you still be as paranoiac, you never know, that skinhead who gave you that slap maybe would have shook your hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 again the gospel according to Sp Lemaquis ,if you are anti immigration or anti muslim you must be racist and fascist change the record or at least take notice of the posts,Tyndall founded the BNP but obviously they sought a new leader otherwise Griffin wouldnt now be in that position now just suppose they had found someone to take them down different road but still under the banner of the BNP,I know its asking a lot of your paranoiac mind to take in but if the said leader were to drop the thuggishness and its devotees and contrive to make the BNP into a valid party which objects to unopposed immigration would you still be as paranoiac, you never know, that skinhead who gave you that slap maybe would have shook your hand. I've seen nothing to suggest the BNP is anything other than the NF with briefly better PR. It's now just an organisation dedicated to paying griffens mortgage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 You Phil or maybe I'll go searching for the mythical Bangy and vote for him,he must be popular he seems to have your passionate attraction No worries Clint! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikem8634 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 again the gospel according to Sp Lemaquis ,if you are anti immigration or anti muslim you must be racist and fascist change the record or at least take notice of the posts,Tyndall founded the BNP but obviously they sought a new leader otherwise Griffin wouldnt now be in that position now just suppose they had found someone to take them down different road but still under the banner of the BNP,I know its asking a lot of your paranoiac mind to take in but if the said leader were to drop the thuggishness and its devotees and contrive to make the BNP into a valid party which objects to unopposed immigration would you still be as paranoiac, you never know, that skinhead who gave you that slap maybe would have shook your hand. Immigration may be a good deal freer than you'd like but it is not unopposed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliceBB Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 In the interest of balance, fairness and transparency, I'd like to point everyone to the result of the Nether Edge council election result 2012.. Just so that we all know where Jeffrey is coming from. As for UKIP having any policies other than their well known stance on immigration, they do. Most of them seem to revolve around getting into a time machine and setting course for 1952. Ha! Absolutely. Mr Shaw also failed fairly spectacularly to persuade the voters (of Sheffield Central) of UKIP's credibility in the General Election of 2010: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/constituency/d93.stm Three cheers for British democracy! ---------- Post added 30-11-2012 at 11:47 ---------- There' ll be no stopping that delusional Nigel Farrage since UKIP came in second and third (rather than their usual eighth) in the bye-elections held yesterday. He's over the moon, it seems. It's still losing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poppet2 Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 In the interest of balance, fairness and transparency, I'd like to point everyone to the result of the Nether Edge council election result 2012.. Just so that we all know where Jeffrey is coming from. As for UKIP having any policies other than their well known stance on immigration, they do. Most of them seem to revolve around getting into a time machine and setting course for 1952. Also in the interest of balance, fairness and transparency, at least Jeffrey explains UKIP's point of view, something which is obfuscated by the Tory press. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.