Mecky Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 Mecky doesn't answer inconvenient questions Obilix. Likewise, he does not answer the questions put to him and accuses me of not reading. He just tries to draw out arguments and tries changing topic to a well-rehearsed subject he thinks he can win. Then he starts getting agressive when he starts losing. I mean, just look at this thread for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 Likewise, he just tries to draw out arguments and tries changing topics to something he thinks he can win. I'm sorry Mecky, are you going to please answer the eminently reasonable points above? Or are you intending to duck the question yet again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 See what I mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 So that'll be a no then. We finally have an answer to your question in post #92 - "What was Labours mess" and the answer is, "They were useless and spent all the money" Nice to see you agree with me Mecky for once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magilla Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 See what I mean No, not really. The only person seriously trying to duck anything appears to be you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
convert Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 No, not really. The only person seriously trying to duck anything appears to be you. Agreed. Labour left us in the 'brown' smelly stuff, with none of the green folding stuff to help us get ourselves out of it. I'd been a Labour voter for most of my adult life, not anymore. They'll never grasp the nettle (not too sure if the ConDems will either, but they've at least made a start). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supertramp Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 That's because the Jews despite their vile treatment by the historic extreme right are still very successful which debunks every left argument about why other races and nationalities are not up to scratch. Hitler was extreme left, the clue is in the name of his party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 You er, like missed the National part of the name of the NSDAP then? As well as the who one germany one race sort of stuff they got up to you know? Hardly the stuff of the Left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 You er, like missed the National part of the name of the NSDAP then? As well as the who one germany one race sort of stuff they got up to you know? Hardly the stuff of the Left. Is there much difference between the extremes of either side? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 Is there much difference between the extremes of either side? Almost none as far as I can see. The whole left to right spectrum seems more like a circle than a linear thing, with the extremes of left and right meeting at the bottom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.