mumkin Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 There was quite a large thread about this which seems the have disappeared recently... I get the impression some on SF are getting "contacted" http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/show....php?t=1098293 It's a shame as the discussions regarding the City Center and proposed developments involve us all. We should, as citizens of Sheffield, be allowed to discuss freely and without censure the happenings of such a topic. (or until some litigious feckwhit decides otherwise) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodmally Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 The threads on this subject keep vanishing, methinks the lawyers have been in touch Which is rather odd given The Star seem to be able to freely publish stories on the subject. Yes I was typing away and it disappeared. I then posted a new thread thinking it was me doing something wrong and Mort said it had been closed for review. Thats the thing with censorship you dont know what not to put as what not to put is censored leaving everyone confused. As for the topic. I dont see any problem with this Next store. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 Thats the thing with censorship you dont know what not to put as what not to put is censored leaving everyone confused. I've been saying this for years. The stock "contact the helpdesk" is a cop-out, just give a simple explanation for the thread closure, like with Saville. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willman Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 It is encumbent upon the poster to include some personal remark - not simply cut and paste or simply insert a link.This has been explained in post 3.Which is why this one was closed originally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mumkin Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 It is encumbent upon the poster to include some personal remark - not simply cut and paste or simply insert a link.This has been explained in post 3.Which is why this one was closed originally Oh Dear!! But well done on implementing the rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penistone999 Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 Anyway ,back to the thread topic, i think the council have shot themselves in the foot over the NEXT planning refusal, and have shown their complete lack of ambition for the future of the city ,and their total obsession with the Sevenstone farce. The massive public support for the Next home and Garden store is concrete proof that the council have got it totally wrong yet again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mumkin Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 Anyway ,back to the thread topic, i think the council have shot themselves in the foot over the NEXT planning refusal, and have shown their complete lack of ambition for the future of the city ,and their total obsession with the Sevenstone farce. The massive public support for the Next home and Garden store is concrete proof that the council have got it totally wrong yet again. Well no real surprise there then. Just awaiting the arrival of Planner 1 into the thread explaining how the Counsel is right and we're all in the wrong.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodmally Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 Well no real surprise there then. Just awaiting the arrival of Planner 1 into the thread explaining how the Counsel is right and we're all in the wrong.... Well ok they have one opinion you have yours. Why do you not think its a good idea I like a good balance of different opinions and I cannot personally see a problem with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Litotes Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 Wouldn't it have been easier to remove the offending post rather than the whole thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza c Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 i went down the Moor today, the new street lighting is the same style as we had in early 90's just a different colour, and an area that has had new flagstone tiling laid has tiles missing with large lumps of tarmac to plug the gap. they may have run out of money already. new market building looks impressive though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.