truman Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 You still need a man's sperm and a woman's ova to create a child. Science hasn't figured out a way round that yet. Nope..you can do it with somatic cell nuclear transfer...scientifically it'll work but ethically it's not allowed...on humans anyway.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happ Hazzard Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Well that's just wrong. There are more than enough children in the world already. Why mess about with cells to artificially create more? If Elton wanted another child he should have adopted one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMorris Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Moderator Message: I have had occasion to remove several posts (and those quoting them) from this thread, for nothing short of homophobic rantings. Which in my opinion is no different to racist rantings. Please keep those kind of comments to yourself, they are not appreciated and not wanted in this forum. If you have a problem with that, then there are alternative forums. I won't be posting further warnings. Holidays will be issued. Thank you for your cooperation folks Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parvo Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 could always have a mother like this would that be better? http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1111405 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Elton John is dead again? I keep reading it as that. Glad he's alive and well and most of his body seems operational. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bypassblade Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 I think what it does prove is the strength of how money talks, lets face it if a normal 65 year old bloke announced he'd become a dad he'd be lampooned. Like the post said earlier if Jagger does it, whey hay. It's like 20 or so years ago if someone had a child outside wedlock the child was a <REMOVED>, then it became popular to say if a celebrity does it, it's a "love child", double standards or what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olive Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 .....................then folks wonder why kids are screwed up. Poor kids. They will have everything and more that money can buy except a normal lifestyle. Yes, something about this just makes me feel uneasy. I've nothing against same-sex couples bringing up children, but there's of the "we've got everything else, now what else can we buy?" about this. Same with Madonna "acquiring" kids. It's like the children are another bauble with which to decorate their strange lives. The kids will certainly have everything money can throw at them, but a stable upbringing? Not sure about that. Perhaps there's some sour grapes on my part, as I could never dream of having the type of monetary riches Elton has, but just because you can afford to do something, it doesn't mean you should. Also, just because other people who are probably ill-suited to parenthood have kids, doesn't mean Elton etc should as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted January 18, 2013 Share Posted January 18, 2013 Yes, something about this just makes me feel uneasy. I've nothing against same-sex couples bringing up children, but there's of the "we've got everything else, now what else can we buy?" about this. Same with Madonna "acquiring" kids. It's like the children are another bauble with which to decorate their strange lives. The kids will certainly have everything money can throw at them, but a stable upbringing? Not sure about that. Perhaps there's some sour grapes on my part, as I could never dream of having the type of monetary riches Elton has, but just because you can afford to do something, it doesn't mean you should. Also, just because other people who are probably ill-suited to parenthood have kids, doesn't mean Elton etc should as well. Have you considered a name change-to some thing like Reginald Dwight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jam1e Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Same sex couples shouldnt be allowed children, IMO its morally wrong. Ive nothing against homosexuality - what sexuality people are is there own business however raising a child in that kind of environment is not healthy - can you imagine how much that child is going to get bullied at school due to it? And kids being kids, you can guarantee that will happen. very selfish and certainly not putting the childs best interests first IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Same sex couples shouldnt be allowed children, IMO its morally wrong. Ive nothing against homosexuality - what sexuality people are is there own business however raising a child in that kind of environment is not healthy - can you imagine how much that child is going to get bullied at school due to it? And kids being kids, you can guarantee that will happen. very selfish and certainly not putting the childs best interests first IMO. Do you think that kid will wear a t-shirt alluding to his unusual circumstances?How will other children find out-perhaps a bigot with a loud mouth might discover their secret and spread gossip.You must know someone like this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.