Bypassblade Posted January 26, 2013 Share Posted January 26, 2013 What sentence was given to the last person who went up Snowdon like this? I have absolutely no idea ---------- Post added 26-01-2013 at 11:17 ---------- He got what he deserved "Williams was handed a six month jail sentence for the first dangerous driving conviction, 10 months for the second offence, and a further six months for failing to answer bail at that start of his trial. The sentences must be served consecutively, making a total of 22 months behind bars" Three offences and 3 convictions. How many multiple murderers would only get 22 months.? I didn't mention murders I said drivers who kill, but given that murderers sentences are on the whole pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoroB Posted January 26, 2013 Share Posted January 26, 2013 I think it's a bit steep. Sure is - highest mountain in Wales. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willman Posted January 26, 2013 Share Posted January 26, 2013 I have absolutely no idea ---------- Post added 26-01-2013 at 11:17 ---------- I didn't mention murders I said drivers who kill, but given that murderers sentences are on the whole pathetic. No you didn't you said "if he'd killed someone". No indication of driving ,stabbing or whatever. However if he'd killed on three different occasions he would have recieved more than 6 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That easy Posted January 26, 2013 Share Posted January 26, 2013 The world has gone mental. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-west-wales-21087633 Ok so he shouldn't have been there, twice but 22 months. ??? Victimless crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26, 2013 Share Posted January 26, 2013 He deserves that sentence just for the vehicle he chooses to drive. And for being an utter [expletive deleted]. Either that, or not all his dogs are barking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted January 26, 2013 Share Posted January 26, 2013 Victimless crime. Why do you say that? ---------- Post added 26-01-2013 at 11:31 ---------- And for being an utter [expletive deleted]. Either that, or not all his dogs are barking. From the report, he does sound a sandwich short. Maybe next time, he will resort to talking long drives off short piers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted January 26, 2013 Share Posted January 26, 2013 I have absolutely no idea ---------- Post added 26-01-2013 at 11:17 ---------- I didn't mention murders I said drivers who kill, but given that murderers sentences are on the whole pathetic. If you dont know what the last offender got then you cannot address consistency,can you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bypassblade Posted January 26, 2013 Share Posted January 26, 2013 If you dont know what the last offender got then you cannot address consistency,can you? Well given that I don't follow the news this closely, but I'm still entitled to an opinion. I didn't even know it was possible to drive up there in 1st place, my post was highlighting the inconsistencies in our legal system, so I can discuss consistency.. He got 22 months, for doing a silly jape, people who kill others by reckless driving get 3 years, serving 18 so they technically do 7 months more for taking a life, well if that's not madness looks like it's bum out in Fargate time again. In regards to murderers they take a life so should be given life, not 30 years, whole of life till they die. They can come out the person they killed isn't so chuffin lucky they should not see daylight again the only time being when they curl up their toes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted January 26, 2013 Share Posted January 26, 2013 Well given that I don't follow the news this closely, but I'm still entitled to an opinion. I didn't even know it was possible to drive up there in 1st place, my post was highlighting the inconsistencies in our legal system, so I can discuss consistency.. He got 22 months, for doing a silly jape, people who kill others by reckless driving get 3 years, serving 18 so they technically do 7 months more for taking a life, well if that's not madness looks like it's bum out in Fargate time again. In regards to murderers they take a life so should be given life, not 30 years, whole of life till they die. They can come out the person they killed isn't so chuffin lucky they should not see daylight again the only time being when they curl up their toes. I simply thought you need to compare like with like to appraise consistency.I do not know the Fargate expression you use but I do know people can get silly when drinking.I assumed you were past that stage of life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkleyIan Posted January 26, 2013 Share Posted January 26, 2013 35 quid for killing a fellow human being http://road.cc/content/news/73826-taxi-driver-fined-%C2%A335-3-points-his-licence-after-cyclist-killed-collission Magistrates in Solihull have fined a taxi driver £35 and given him three penally points for an incident last year which he collided with a cyclist and then carried him for a further 90 metres on the bonnet of his car colliding with traffic signs and eventually hitting a tree. 20 year old animation student Tom Ridgway died of his injuries shortly afterwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.