MrSmith Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 I'll be happy to discuss that with you after you've answered the question It has no relevance to the topic so I guess the discussion is over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RootsBooster Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 It has no relevance to the topic so I guess the discussion is over. Of course it is relevant, it is a direct comparison to same sex marriage (or the prohibition of). I take it you don't want to answer the question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Of course it is relevant, it is a direct comparison to same sex marriage (or the prohibition of). I take it you don't want to answer the question? I already demonstrated that it isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RootsBooster Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 I already demonstrated that it isn't. Where ? Was it the post where you compared it to your wife being free to call a settee whatever she wants? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 I already demonstrated that it isn't. You've done nothing of the sort - do you think if you keep on twisting things and telling wholesale lies that people will start to believe you? You aren't even funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteMorris Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Moderator Note: Bickering posts removed and those quoting them. Come on folks, show a little decorum. Please!...I did ask nicely! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaliRichard Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 John I only briefly saw your post before the thread got 'cleaneed up' by the Mods (I personally don't object to the points you made and am not entirely sure why your post went, but I will address it as best as I can from memory) I referred to you as being like the other poster mentioned not, as you seemed to think, because of your having 'multiple accounts' but because you had been asked a direct question by me relating to the thread, and if I recall a different one by another poster, and avoided answering them but instead of merely stating you weren't going to answer them you tried to dance around the question as if it hadn't been asked. I'm not sure why you think I'm middle class - anything to back that up? I'm also not sure why you assume I'm a Yorkshireman - there are many forum users from outside Yorkshire. I'm also at a bit of a loss as to why you think I'm apologist - (or a liberal - did you say that? I can't quite remember). Explanations to the above would be greatly welcomed. As to my 'having changed', all I have done is prompt you to answer a question which you blatantly ignored, and likened you to another Forum user who is renowned for dodging questions. Since joining this forum I have chased people up who avoid direct questions so how do you consider I have changed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 John I only briefly saw your post before the thread got 'cleaneed up' by the Mods (I personally don't object to the points you made and am not entirely sure why your post went, but I will address it as best as I can from memory) I referred to you as being like the other poster mentioned not, as you seemed to think, because of your having 'multiple accounts' but because you had been asked a direct question by me relating to the thread, and if I recall a different one by another poster, and avoided answering them but instead of merely stating you weren't going to answer them you tried to dance around the question as if it hadn't been asked. I'm not sure why you think I'm middle class - anything to back that up? I'm also not sure why you assume I'm a Yorkshireman - there are many forum users from outside Yorkshire. I'm also at a bit of a loss as to why you think I'm apologist - (or a liberal - did you say that? I can't quite remember). Explanations to the above would be greatly welcomed. As to my 'having changed', all I have done is prompt you to answer a question which you blatantly ignored, and likened you to another Forum user who is renowned for dodging questions. Since joining this forum I have chased people up who avoid direct questions so how do you consider I have changed? Just because you don't like or understand the answer to a question doesn't mean the question hasn’t been answered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaliRichard Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 Just because you don't like or understand the answer to a question doesn't mean the question hasn’t been answered. He didn't answer, he didn't give me an answer I didn't like, nor that I don't understand - he merely made no attempt to answer. He didn't quite go to your lengths of pretending he'd answered when he hadn't but he didn't answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 He didn't answer, he didn't give me an answer I didn't like, nor that I don't understand - he merely made no attempt to answer. He didn't quite go to your lengths of pretending he'd answered when he hadn't but he didn't answer. There you go again assuming an answer hasn't been given just because you didn't understand the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.