sedith Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 I welcome the micro chipping of dogs, but live in hope that this is a preliminary step to re introducing the dog licence. Once they have you on record as owning an animal it would be quite easy to obtain a licence fee off you. The old system was unworkable as owners couldn't be traced. Maybe the introduction of a £200 yearly dog licence, with a fine of £500 for not having one could fund a workforce going round removing the blue bags full of dog sh*t hanging from the trees in our parks and woodland ... ughhh!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossyrooney Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 I share your disgust,if people were more considerate they would use brown or green bags depending on the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erebus Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Sounds great, which should lead to refining of the chip, so that in a decade it can be implanted in humans. This type of technology in the future, and I strees in the future, could lead to tracking people, and maybe imobilising them, and in some case terminating them.. The future look nbright, and in a free democratic culture predicated on corporate greed, such a privatised system would be most interesting. But one step at a time as one has to get people used to the idea, and like us being under computer, telephone, surveylance today, things can only get better for corporate intereests under the excuse of freedom for the majority. Its all for the common good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Total Chaos Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 I welcome the micro chipping of dogs, but live in hope that this is a preliminary step to re introducing the dog licence. Once they have you on record as owning an animal it would be quite easy to obtain a licence fee off you. The old system was unworkable as owners couldn't be traced. Maybe the introduction of a £200 yearly dog licence, with a fine of £500 for not having one could fund a workforce going round removing the blue bags full of dog sh*t hanging from the trees in our parks and woodland ... ughhh!!! Ok,so the government may introduce another form of unlawful tax,like the TV license,to rip off more citizens and your bothered about dog poo in trees? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happ Hazzard Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Dogs that misbehave should be shot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alien52 Posted February 6, 2013 Share Posted February 6, 2013 Dogs that misbehave should be shot! Shhhhhh !!!! PTS and run free at the rainbow bridge poor furbabies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 Ok,so the government may introduce another form of unlawful tax,like the TV license,to rip off more citizens and your bothered about dog poo in trees? TV licence is voluntary. If you don't like it don't watch TV, or use any of the alternative methods that are now around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sedith Posted February 7, 2013 Author Share Posted February 7, 2013 If you don't want to pay for a dog licence, then don't have a dog ... simples!! You can then fill a blue bag with your own excrement and hang it from a tree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Total Chaos Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 TV licence is voluntary. If you don't like it don't watch TV, or use any of the alternative methods that are now around. Or just dont pay it,which by law you dont have to,ive stopped paying it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geared Posted February 7, 2013 Share Posted February 7, 2013 So how can they fine you for watching TV without having a Licence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.