Stoned Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 What specific crimes are those? According to US tv, Treason...lol.. War crimes...bigger lol Crimes against humanity.... MEGA LOL!! I even saw one psycho say he was against the death penalty but he thinks the US should send in the special forces (presumably to the UK ) to 'illegally kill' Assange If it was not so sick it would almost be funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apelike Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 Of course there is . this idiot is a traitor who has leaked classified information all over the tinterweb . He cannot be allowed to get away with it. The Yanks want him ,and rightly so . Given the fact that the UK and the US have been involved in extraordinary rendition and cant be trusted that in itself is a good reason for him to stay put. Sometime classified information should be leaked when its in the public interest to do so as Governments are also accountable. Remember the Clive Ponting affair? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 And if he escapes then there would be an outcry and claims of incompetence. He should go to Sweden to answer the charges. he wouldnt be escaping, hed be going to tesco lol has he been outside in 3 years? dont think so cos theres been a couple of coppers parked outside for 3 years Oo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLASGOWOODS Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 he wouldnt be escaping, hed be going to tesco lol dont think so cos theres been a couple of coppers parked outside for 3 years Oo Ooh that's illegal! Working time directive n all that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quik Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/man-is-being-arbitrarily-detained-at-argos-un-rules-20160205105926 UN identifies a further victim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SqueakyPete Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 So your statement the information he had wasnt classified is something you still believe? Certainly now what the US felt and found. They clearly were classified military documents and manning had no right to obtain or hand them over. Thats a given,but the real question is "what did Assange do wrong?" (not morally,but legally). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quik Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 Thats a given,but the real question is "what did Assange do wrong?" (not morally,but legally). Rape is the main one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoned Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/man-is-being-arbitrarily-detained-at-argos-un-rules-20160205105926 UN identifies a further victim. Only the ignorant or intensely stupid would make jokes about such a situation. The UK, the beacon of light and democracy is choosing to ignore the UN. Its a pity we didn't ignore the UN when they said we could invade Iraq but then there is profit in war. Not so much profit in the sheeple finding out what is really happening though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SqueakyPete Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 Rape is the main one. I Didn't realise the U.S wanted Assange for rape:rolleyes: I figured since I was talking about the U.S and Manning,you might have got that.Guess not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattleonard Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 Only the ignorant or intensely stupid would make jokes about such a situation. The UK, the beacon of light and democracy is choosing to ignore the UN. Its a pity we didn't ignore the UN when they said we could invade Iraq but then there is profit in war. Not so much profit in the sheeple finding out what is really happening though. The reason people are able to joke about the UN's judgement is that it's laughable. He's not being detained; he's welcome to leave the embassy any time he wants to. As for him being a hero, it would be all well and good if wikileaks' work was simply publishing evidence of criminal activity. But it's not; it's publishing as much stuff as they possibly can, generally without redaction or enquiry as to what it even contains, or what the fallout would be for the innocent people whose data they publish. And then he has the gall to whine about being mistreated when he chooses not to face trial for a crime he may have committed. The suggestion that since he is such a "hero" then he should be treated as immune from prosecution is the sick joke. And as for putting up statues, maybe the "small" matter of whether he's a rapist should be cleared up first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now