Jump to content

What does unnatural actually mean?


danot

Recommended Posts

There are millions of orphans and unwanted children in the world. Would it not be more "natural" to take one or more of these already existing children and provide them with a loving home than bring a child into the world using artificial means?

 

I ask a question, I have no experience or fixed opinion on the matter but would be interested to learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are millions of orphans and unwanted children in the world. Would it not be more "natural" to take one or more of these already existing children and provide them with a loving home than bring a child into the world using artificial means?

 

I ask a question, I have no experience or fixed opinion on the matter but would be interested to learn.

 

I suspect it's more "natural" to want your own offspring....do many animals adopt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is a house natural?.. If you think not then is a termite mound or a bird's best natural? If they are what's the difference?

 

un·nat·u·ral

/ˌənˈnaCH(ə)rəl/

Adjective

Contrary to the ordinary course of nature; abnormal.

Not existing in nature; artificial.

Synonyms

abnormal - artificial - factitious - affected

 

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=definition+unnatural

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect it's more "natural" to want your own offspring....do many animals adopt?

 

If we have evolved sufficiently to be able to carry out procedures that allow barren women to conceive surely we have have evolved enough to emotionally attach ourselves to youngsters that we have not actually given birth to.

 

"She who cannot be a mother to one can be mother to thousands".

 

---------- Post added 20-02-2013 at 17:23 ----------

 

It depends on if you value spreading your own genes, or not.

 

I realise we are all predisposed to spread our genes. As humans now control their fertility and none of us lead a "natural" life surely we can control this primeval instinct also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

But what doesn't exist in nature, Wex?

 

We are part of nature so anything we do exists in nature.

 

Everything exists in nature!

 

---------- Post added 20-02-2013 at 17:51 ----------

 

If we have evolved sufficiently to be able to carry out procedures that allow barren women to conceive surely we have have evolved enough to emotionally attach ourselves to youngsters that we have not actually given birth to.

 

"She who cannot be a mother to one can be mother to thousands".

 

---------- Post added 20-02-2013 at 17:23 ----------

 

 

I realise we are all predisposed to spread our genes. As humans now control their fertility and none of us lead a "natural" life surely we can control this primeval instinct also.

 

Probably not. Instincts work on a lower level than learned & other behaviours so they override them.

 

Hence the invention of Gods & afterlives (IMHO).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where do we draw the line on what we view as natural or unnatural? For instance(and I'm only using this as an example, I 'm not in any way against IVF)- Is it natural or unnatural when a couple who are unable to conceive naturally conceive through fertility treatment? I often hear it argued- "If nature didn't intend for it to happen then we shouldn't be meddling with it, then on the flip side the counter argument could be that anything we do as to natural because we ourselves are a product of nature. So Where do we draw the line on this?

 

I suppose it all depends on the context of the conversation really.

 

In common language 'unnatural', as has already been pointed out usually refers to anything 'man-made'. We would say a building is unnatural because it was made, not grown, for example.

 

However in the wider philosophical context it could easily be argued that everything is natural, as human achievement comes from the human cognitive ability and therefore all things 'man made', even those contrary to the things that are already present in nature, are still technically a product of nature.

 

Furthermore all things man made are made of the 'ingredients' already present in nature, so we could argue that 'man made' is not too distant from all living things 'evolving' and shaping/using their environment to benefit themselves.

 

So to my mind I would suggest 'What does unnatural actually mean?' relies heavily upon the context of the question and how 'deep' the conversation is willing to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In common language 'unnatural', as has already been pointed out usually refers to anything 'man-made'. We would say a building is unnatural because it was made, not grown, for example.

Yet 'manufactured' actually means 'made by hand' or 'man-made', precisely the opposite of what it now signifies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.