Jump to content

Bye Bye AAA rating


Recommended Posts

Would it be too cynical to suggest that these 'ratings agencies' are in the pockets of governments and big business, and produce findings to suit?

 

Yes it would. Even the Telegraph says "Osborne staked everything on AAA. This downgrade is a disaster for him".

 

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/iainmartin1/100203982/osborne-staked-everything-on-aaa-this-downgrade-is-a-disaster-for-him/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps we should stop paying billions to the EU, billions in foreign aid that goes to corrupt regimes and letting all the immigrants in to claim benefits

 

Sign this petition to restrict Bulgarian and Romanians from entering the UK:

 

epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/41492

 

 

Now over 42,000

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Moodys one of the agencies that gave good credit ratings to those toxic debts?

 

This could well be the start of a down-would spiral, which some were hoping for just so they could say "I told you so" while in the grand scheme of things, I doubt it will have much effect.

 

If Osborne did stake everything on the UK keeping its AAA rating, and this is not a media created headline, he should go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Moodys one of the agencies that gave good credit ratings to those toxic debts?

 

Yes. And continued to support Osborne's seriously flawed austerity experiment even when it became very clear it was failing a year ago.

 

It's a scandal that Osborne staked the future of the country on courting major rating agencies that had already proven to have a uniformally disasterous track record in economic analysis.

 

The only ratings agency worth taking notice of is Egan-Jones, and they already downgraded the UK to AA- in June 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Moodys one of the agencies that gave good credit ratings to those toxic debts?

 

This could well be the start of a down-would spiral, which some were hoping for just so they could say "I told you so" while in the grand scheme of things, I doubt it will have much effect.

 

If Osborne did stake everything on the UK keeping its AAA rating, and this is not a media created headline, he should go.

 

 

On the contrary I think we have done well to hang on to the AAA rating these last 3 years. The agencies were threatening to downgrade in 2010 unless we cut spending. Since then virtually every EU nation has downgraded several points. So in real terms we have gained ground. Our borrowing costs have actually fallen because regardless of our actual rating we are perceived as a safer haven for investors cash than the others. It is all relative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keeping that AAA rating has cost us a lot.

 

We could have lost it 2 years ago and be no worse off.

 

What’s it cost us?

There are more people in work.

People are still cueing up to have their cars washed.

The shops are still full of people buying stuff.

The roads are still full of traffic.

Who is actually worse off because the economy isn’t growing.

I don’t live in a wealthy area and I don’t see anyone going without, people can still afford to buy food, cloth their kids, drive their cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. And continued to support Osborne's seriously flawed austerity experiment even when it became very clear it was failing a year ago.

 

It's a scandal that Osborne staked the future of the country on courting major rating agencies that had already proven to have a uniformally disasterous track record in economic analysis.

 

The only ratings agency worth taking notice of is Egan-Jones, and they already downgraded the UK to AA- in June 2012.

 

its not an experiment, its the same process used by the majority of other effected countries.

 

The only countries left with their AAA rating are Germany and Canada, and they are also looking to be downgraded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. And continued to support Osborne's seriously flawed austerity experiment even when it became very clear it was failing a year ago.

It's a scandal that Osborne staked the future of the country on courting major rating agencies that had already proven to have a uniformally disasterous track record in economic analysis.

 

The only ratings agency worth taking notice of is Egan-Jones, and they already downgraded the UK to AA- in June 2012.

 

In relation to this, the IMF also initially backed Osborne's austerity programme (as they did Greece and Spain's), but about 6 months ago began to express grave reservations about such austerity programmes when they realised things weren't going to plan.

 

It's shocking that such institutions who national governments place so much esteem upon are at best apologists for the current crisis, at worst chief architects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What’s it cost us?

There are more people in work.

People are still cueing up to have their cars washed.

The shops are still full of people buying stuff.

The roads are still full of traffic.

Who is actually worse off because the economy isn’t growing.

I don’t live in a wealthy area and I don’t see anyone going without, people can still afford to buy food, cloth their kids, drive their cars.

 

Nail & Head immediately spring to mind !!!!

 

Top post !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.