ronthenekred Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Page 3 has been there for a long time, what difference does it make. Yet another excuse for the pc crowd to get out their torches and pitchforks I see. Try putting all that effort into helping africans or petitioning government instead. See post 41 Who cares about tits...Africans are dying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 This is one of the reasons I'm not fully behind the "Ban Page 3" movement, as much as I agree. A. Forcing the issue to the point of banning it is wrong. B. Expecting this old fashioned idea to be dropped tomorrow is unrealistic. I can even foresee the lower gutter press (Daily Star, Daily Sport) carrying it on for years further than The Sun will. So ultimately, it should go away - but it won't. I don't really care one way or the other, but wouldn't ban it. The sun serves a purpose, if someone has it under their arm you know they will be stupid and bigoted without having to actually engage them in conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grissom Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Don't ban it, have a pull-out instead... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
some guy Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I don't read The Sun anyway, and frankly, if you want pictures of boobs, then use the internet! However, if page 3 does get 'banned', I can see a load of feminists jumping on their victory wagon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael_W Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I hate arguments like this. Really shallow dumb nonsense. Here is something I don't care about. Thus it is silly to care about it. Thus, you are all silly. My point being, that the issue, or discussion about pictures of topless women in a newspaper/s (which has been a topic on here before, if I'm not mistaken), is IMHO a fairly trivial matter, but hey jump on your high horse why don't ya Then again shallow dumb nonsense accounts for a fair old percentage of the forum eh Chris, why should I be any different Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonzo77 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 no it shouldn't be banned - people should simply look at their own daughters, imagine them being paraded in their knickers in murdoch's rag and agree not to buy the piece of crap until they put something better on page 3. page 3 would disappear pretty quickly. Wow! Are you sure you're on the right forum? Quite a sensible answer that! You'd make a terrible politician though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereolab Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Question: If its ok for them to be topless, why not show them fully naked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Make a compromise: Ban page 3 by all means, but if that goes Coronation Street also goes too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonzo77 Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Question: If its ok for them to be topless, why not show them fully naked? Why not have a page 3 man, standing fully proud? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cressida Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Why not have a page 3 man, standing fully proud? A tad much of a morning:hihi: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.