Bypassblade Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 What's Page 3 got to do with sex? It's not 'sexy' in the slightest. I said the people who hate it, nowhere in my post does it liken page 3 to sex, I was eluding to people are too puritanical. This is the 21st century not 1533 we no longer burn people, no I don't read papers & in almost 55 years I have NEVER bought a copy of the Sun. I know about page 3 but it is a total rag of a paper that I would never waste money on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 I was eluding to people are too puritanical. Nobody is opposed to Page 3 because of puritanical reasons. There's no link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bypassblade Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Nobody is opposed to Page 3 because of puritanical reasons. There's no link. Please, there are loads & loads of prudes and such who are opposed to P3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael_W Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 What's Page 3 got to do with sex? It's not 'sexy' in the slightest. I wrote this nearly 18 months ago, and I still stand by it. Ahhh so I take it your still buying the Sun then Chris, or do you just pike it off over somebody's shoulder ? Another modern day Mary Whitehouse ....... I don't know some people are such bloody hypocrites. All these Sun reader bashers too, clearly reading it themselves to form their opinions, I'll bet they read the Daily Mail too ...... online of course, so they can froth all over their keyboards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Another modern day Mary Whitehouse ....... I don't know some people are such bloody hypocrites. I'm not trying to ban or censor anything. I'm nothing like Mary Whitehouse. In what way am I hypocritical? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 DA Is there any newspaper that is newsworthy, and at the same time show tits? Or is it a case of the news within a tit paper is of as equal significance as the tit for the reader/looker? ---------- Post added 28-02-2013 at 08:34 ---------- Ahhh so I take it your still buying the Sun then Chris, or do you just pike it off over somebody's shoulder ? Another modern day Mary Whitehouse ....... I don't know some people are such bloody hypocrites. All these Sun reader bashers too, clearly reading it themselves to form their opinions, I'll bet they read the Daily Mail too ...... online of course, so they can froth all over their keyboards You don't need to be able to read to look at page 3. That's the beauty of tit mags..they cater for the poorly educated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael_W Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 DA Is there any newspaper that is newsworthy, and at the same time show tits? Or is it a case of the news within a tit paper is of as equal significance as the tit for the reader/looker? ---------- Post added 28-02-2013 at 08:34 ---------- You don't need to be able to read to look at page 3. That's the beauty of tit mags..they cater for the poorly educated. Aye alright Einstein, how come so many of our 'socialist' posters like yourself, are so keen to put down and generalise about those who they believe are not as academically astute. Poorly educated, based on their choice of newspaper ? Really ? What makes people like you such an authority ? I work in a large Sheffield factory, plenty of Sun readers there, they don't buy it for page 3, they buy it because it's a light read on a short break, just like the Mirror, The Star etc ..... like I have said before, those who read the Telegraph, The Guardian etc must have long lunch breaks or too much time on their hands ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 MarrIAge is often a smoke screen. For 'often', read 'occasionally'; far more often it's evidence of heterosexuality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carosio Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Anybody care to attempt drafting an amendment (perhaps a paragraph in length) to the Obscene Publications Act which would effectively achieve what the OP suggests? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnvqsos Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Aye alright Einstein, how come so many of our 'socialist' posters like yourself, are so keen to put down and generalise about those who they believe are not as academically astute. Poorly educated, based on their choice of newspaper ? Really ? What makes people like you such an authority ? I work in a large Sheffield factory, plenty of Sun readers there, they don't buy it for page 3, they buy it because it's a light read on a short break, just like the Mirror, The Star etc ..... like I have said before, those who read the Telegraph, The Guardian etc must have long lunch breaks or too much time on their hands ! The Guardian readers can read the Sun readers read only to make sense of the pictures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.