vResistance Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2284337/TV-licence-evader-refused-pay-BBC-covered-facts-9-11.html#ixzz2Lx1GkaQZ Interesting article in today's Mail. The only criticism I have really is that they say the BBC "allegedly" reported the collapse of 'building 7' over 20 mins early. It is an undisputed fact. (as seen in the video below) Tony Rooke talks about his case in this vid- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supertramp Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Another nutter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchresearch Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 You've missed out the more amusing part of the story in that this is all down to someone refusing to pay his licence fee because he believed the BBC to be part of a cover up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathAxe Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Dailymail. 'Nuff said really, not even going to read such rubbish from a pathetic newspaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockjaw Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Pfffftt! Claim on the youtube Vid: "Tony Rooke has been granted a court hearing where he is challenging the BBC's support of terrorist activity". Actual factual fact: He was summoned for not paying his license. Granted a court hearing, eh, vResistance? Any comment? Won't hold my breath... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I thought the BBC were all Lefties ... according to some people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Pfffftt! Claim on the youtube Vid: "Tony Rooke has been granted a court hearing where he is challenging the BBC's support of terrorist activity". Actual factual fact: He was summoned for not paying his license. Granted a court hearing, eh, vResistance? Any comment? Won't hold my breath... lol, wait for the next thrilling installment where he's up before the beak for doing 42 in a 30mph zone which will be described as "being granted a judicial review of whether Prince Philip is an illuminati lizard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeMaquis Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I thought the BBC were all Lefties ... according to some people The BBC can't be that left-wing if it's taken on James Purnell, a man so reactionary that when he was a Labour MP he wanted to charge pensioners 26% interest on crisis loans instead of 0%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2284337/TV-licence-evader-refused-pay-BBC-covered-facts-9-11.html#ixzz2Lx1GkaQZ Interesting article in today's Mail. The only criticism I have really is that they say the BBC "allegedly" reported the collapse of 'building 7' over 20 mins early. It is an undisputed fact. (as seen in the video below) Tony Rooke talks about his case in this vid- What happened to your hero Tony Farrell - wasn't he summoned for non-payment of council tax - his "defence" being that paying council tax contributed to terrorism. Was that another "success". ---------- Post added 26-02-2013 at 18:01 ---------- You've missed out the more amusing part of the story in that this is all down to someone refusing to pay his licence fee because he believed the BBC to be part of a cover up! I think he was saying the BBC were a terrorist organisation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Interesting article in today's Mail. The only criticism I have really is that they say the BBC "allegedly" reported the collapse of 'building 7' over 20 mins early. It is an undisputed fact. (as seen in the video below) Tony Rooke talks about his case in this vid- You call it interesting. I call it a pile of cack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.