Jump to content

New pope elected


Recommended Posts

Dont matter what the Pope says or thinks about the Falklands. He needs to concentrate his energies and efforts on repairing his dysfuctional church.

Apparently he took the named Francis because like Francis of Assissi he feels great compassion for the world's poor. Fair enough. A good start would be advocating birth control. That's one very effective way to reduce poverty

 

 

How does reducing the potential labour force reduce poverty?.Poverty is a distribution issue and is unrelated to production per se.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does reducing the potential labour force reduce poverty?.Poverty is a distribution issue and is unrelated to production per se.

 

Surely that's a contradiction. First you intimate that reducing the labour force does not reduce poverty and then you say poverty is unrelated to production.

Perhaps you meant reproduction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely that's a contradiction. First you intimate that reducing the labour force does not reduce poverty and then you say poverty is unrelated to production.

Perhaps you meant reproduction.

 

I understand the topic,but you could squeeze some reproduction in at a push.Are you a fan of Malthus-I prefer the views of Amartya Sen,the Indian economist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're thinking of Walter Malthus who was in the Odd Couple with Jack Lime.

 

I dont think you actually have a constructive point to make do you,and are using humour(!) to mask your ignorance.

 

I can understand plain English, at least enough to know that your post contradicted itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand plain English, at least enough to know that your post contradicted itself.

 

I would explain the subtle nuances to you but feel it would be rather futile if you wish to hide behind 1970s corny jokes.Your simplistic views were fully ridiculed by all leading economists who applauded Sen's insight into poverty and famine.Why not read it yourself rather than persist in denial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would explain the subtle nuances to you but feel it would be rather futile if you wish to hide behind 1970s corny jokes.Your simplistic views were fully ridiculed by all leading economists who applauded Sen's insight into poverty and famine.Why not read it yourself rather than persist in denial.

 

What simplistic views are you talking about? The only view I've expressed is that your reply to Harleyman is contradictory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.