andygardener Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Come on everyone, sign the petition. Why? It's pointless. If IDS could survive for a week on worms and the steam off his own **** should we make that the new benefits entitlement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 why? do you think anyone actually cares? Yes 400,000 and counting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna B Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/iain-duncan-smith-iain-duncan-smith-to-live-on-53-a-week The above link is a petition for IDS to live on £53 a week. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9964767/Iain-Duncan-Smith-I-could-live-on-53-per-week.html If people can live on £53 a week. Why do we pay our politicians so much. Surely the taxpayer deserves value for money? And if IDS reckons he can live on £53 a week, then surely he should prove it. By living on £53 a week for a prolonged period, and donating his salary to a foodbank. Oooh, I do so hope we can persuade him to try it. Not down in London, but somewhere in the North East, in a high rise and not just for a week but a month at least, so that the lift can break down at least twice. And can we fix it so that his cooker breaks down in the first week, and he has to go and sign on (5 mile round trip) and explain how he's been looking for work where there is none. Maybe he could need a pair of new shoes, and have to listen to the neighbour's music at 3 0' clock in the morning, and have a row with the little scrote's mother, and then get dog poo shoved through his letter box............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gym_rat Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Yes 400,000 and counting and do you think anyone who counts, cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 £53 a week is plenty. Not for IDS, he spends over £40 on breakfasts and charges the taxpayer for it, while he lives off his multi millionaire father in law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Why? It's pointless. If IDS could survive for a week on worms and the steam off his own **** should we make that the new benefits entitlement? Indeed. Be grateful that David blane isn't a government minister or we'd have the poor living on bottled water in Perspex boxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gym_rat Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Not for IDS, he spends over £40 on breakfasts and charges the taxpayer for it, while he lives off his multi millionaire father in law. should one not be able to reclaim expenses then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmith Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Oooh, I do so hope we can persuade him to try it. Not down in London, but somewhere in the North East, in a high rise and not just for a week but a month at least, so that the lift can break down at least twice. And can we fix it so that his cooker breaks down in the first week, and he has to go and sign on (5 mile round trip) and explain how he's been looking for work where there is none. Maybe he could need a pair of new shoes, and have to listen to the neighbour's music at 3 0' clock in the morning, and have a row with the little scrote's mother, and then get dog poo shoved through his letter box............ I imagin he as already tried it. After leaving the Scots Guards, he spent a period applying for jobs and claiming unemployment benefit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 and do you think anyone who counts, cares? Yes - I'm a great believer in people power - even if it changes nothing, the establishment know they cannot take the mick. Yes there will always be those that couldn't careless, as long as they've got the tv and the tabloids in front of them, and people a couple of rungs beneath them to kick now and then they'll be happy. What would the establishment do without their lackeys ---------- Post added 01-04-2013 at 21:08 ---------- should one not be able to reclaim expenses then? On things that are reasonable - travel, stationery, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gym_rat Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 On things that are reasonable - travel, stationery, etc. sustenance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.