airking Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 If anyone is interested - here's the Judges sentencing remarks that explain the sentences he gave. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/apr/04/mick-philpott-jailed-judge-remarks The judge is a she in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw47 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 also the bankster steal BILLIONS and the head of america criminal justice says they are untouchable. so they get away with it again and again In fairness though they did get massive bonus's in order to alleviate any inner turmoil they may have been suffering from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 The judge is a she in this case. I stand corrected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeweller Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Were you at the trial?Do you consider yourself more qualified than the presiding judge?I am sorry but you do not have either the expertise or the experience to pass a comment,and best confine your judgements to issues less technical. Are you serious? He was found guilty. Either he didn't pour petrol over his house and set it alight which then killed his six children or he did? Court found him guilty of this. What has been at the trial got to do with it? I wasn't at the 66 world cup final but i know England won. The OP is comparing the sentence of both crimes. No one in their right mind can say the copper deserves more time inside than the father who killed his 6 kids. But the judges say otherwise, therefore are not in their right mind, or at least their guide-lines are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLADE8T1 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 One of the country's longest serving prisoners was sentenced to life for manslaughter in the 60's and to my knowledge he was still in prison a few years ago. I had no idea of the longest serving manslaughter case,I was just saying you don't seem to hear of long sentences given. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeweller Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 But your not comparing sentences are you - you are comparing the minimum tariff on a life sentence with a 23 year full term sentence. The actual comparison would be life sentence vs a 23 year sentence. Do you actually believe this? In 15 years he will have the right to go before the parole board. He will play the game, act sorry and go free. But as far as someone of us are concerned, sorry is never enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norseman Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Hope it's the latter. A prime example of a time to bring back the death penalty include that for muggers, murderers, terrorism, child killers and Paedo's and for repetitive crimes. Personally I don't want to pay for these scums luxury lives in prison ..... but then again they'll have to be sectioned off otherwise the other prisoners will do their thing....sorry I can't say this as its not politically correct is it? As for rapists remove the offending article - problem solved! Simples! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLADE8T1 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Are you serious? He was found guilty. Either he didn't pour petrol over his house and set it alight which then killed his six children or he did? Court found him guilty of this. What has been at the trial got to do with it? I wasn't at the 66 world cup final but i know England won. The OP is comparing the sentence of both crimes. No one in their right mind can say the copper deserves more time inside than the father who killed his 6 kids. But the judges say otherwise, therefore are not in their right mind, or at least their guide-lines are not. But will the copper DO more time inside?Because I would bet he won't. As far as im concerned,the copper dealt out a lot of smack,and god only knows how many people died from overdoses due to this. You simply cannot compare two different crimes with different charges with one another.Do you think every sentence is given based on all other sentences that have ever been passed?(no matter what the crime). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeweller Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 A prime example of a time to bring back the death penalty include that for muggers, murderers, terrorism, child killers and Paedo's and for repetitive crimes. Personally I don't want to pay for these scums luxury lives in prison ..... but then again they'll have to be sectioned off otherwise the other prisoners will do their thing....sorry I can't say this as its not politically correct is it? As for rapists remove the offending article - problem solved! Simples! If only everyone shared these views, sometimes i find it hard to believe anyone can think any different to this. But no we have to respect other peoples opinions and their rights. Mention death for these scumbags and its us that get labled the crazy ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLADE8T1 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 Do you actually believe this? In 15 years he will have the right to go before the parole board. He will play the game, act sorry and go free. But as far as someone of us are concerned, sorry is never enough. TBH he doesn't strike me as the kind of guy thats going to do 15 years with totally good behavior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.