Tradescanthia Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 This is great. Blair, who quite possibly is complicit in war crimes, is less evil than the current government? You couldn't make up some of the ****e you read on here. I don't deny Blair is a war criminal, led by the nose by Bush and the oil moguls. He should have faced a PROPER inquiry. But don't tell me the Torys are more humane. Cameron, Osborn, IDS [or IBS ??] are making life intolerable for the vulnerable. To snare a few cretins like the Philpotts they are willing to persecute hundreds of thousands of genuine people, threatening to take away their much needed benefits. Not to mention destroying their dignity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoLdFInGeR Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 I like Blair. He wasn't really a war criminal, he was just scared of Bush. Which is fair enough, have you seen Bush, he's a scary guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadManMoon Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 This is great. Blair, who quite possibly is complicit in war crimes, is less evil than the current government? You couldn't make up some of the ****e you read on here.[/quote Tories voted for the war, so they are also complicit in a war crime. http://www.naba.org.uk/CONTENT/TheAssociation/Parliament/MPs_Vote_War_on_Iraq.pdf Tories are also guilty of crimes against humanity for their attack on the poor and the disabled who they are forcing to live in poverty so that their banker friends can have a massive tax cut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mediumfast Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 This is great. Blair, who quite possibly is complicit in war crimes, is less evil than the current government? You couldn't make up some of the ****e you read on here. Did The Tories support the invasion of Iraq ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeMaquis Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 By 1990 she had become an electoral liability, which Blair never was. Blair as Labour leader; 1997 - 13,518,167 votes or 43.2% 2001 - 10,724,953 votes or 40.7% 2005 - 9,552,436 votes or 35.2% In 2007, just before he resigned as PM, Labour got 26% in the local elections. So Blair managed to lose 4 million votes at general elections despite not being an electoral liability, eh? After 2005 the Tories got Cameron as leader following the unelectable Hague and Howard, and the banking collapses hit Labour hard. As did the expenses scandal. Both of these date back to Blair's time as PM. Blair would have got massacred just as much as Brown did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadManMoon Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 Bliar is a war criminal, and should be arrested as such. Short memories on here, don't forget the note left by NEW LIEbour, no brass left, or words to that effect. Had Bliar stayed on we would now be a bankrupt Country, in a worse condition than we are now. As for Gormless Gordon, the mind boggles as to what would have been the effect of him still in power. Vote UKIP you know it makes sense. Angel. Probably still have a growing economy. And I know you have trouble grasping this concept but it was the bankers who caused the banking crisis. If Cameron had been in office he would have done the same as Brown in proping up the banks. The bankers caused the deficit. Cameron and Osborne insist they still have their high salaries and bonuses and the deficit be paid off by taking it from the rest of us. That includes you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SqueakyPete Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 This is great. Blair, who quite possibly is complicit in war crimes, is less evil than the current government? You couldn't make up some of the ****e you read on here. Here are the votes against. Labour 28% against Conservative 10% against Lib/dem 100% against But I totally agree, "You couldn't make up some of the ****e you read on here" Well said:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 The wino in the pub last night could give Disasterous Dave a run for his money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mediumfast Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 Here are the votes against. Labour 28% against Conservative 10% against Lib/dem 100% against But I totally agree, "You couldn't make up some of the ****e you read on here" Well said:D This is the reason The Tories don't use the old war criminal line too often as it would be so easy to prove they were implicated.The more rabid of their supporters however don't let the facts get in the way of a good rant.only the Lib Dems have the moral highground on this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted April 8, 2013 Share Posted April 8, 2013 The Tories supported the decision to go to war Brian-making then implicitly complicit in a tacit manner. Did they have all the info that Blair was privvy to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.