SBCY Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 I've actually read it. It's rhubarb. It's reasonably possible they were undercover cops or FBI. It's also possible it could be two blokes on their way to or from work or the gym, and they were catching a sporting event. Actually thinking about it I dress in black for work and can be seen in city centres with a colleague. Am I a civillian contractor ? It's not unreasonable to think, that after the bomb went off, they found the nearest FBI agent and said they were just there! "We're witnesses and we saw the whole thing". If they were ex-military they might just have wanted help. Thank you for looking at the photos of the undercover agents . There are at least 5 of the men all dressed the same . Some have the exact same back packs as the ones which exploded . One of the men in the NEW picture shows him missing his black back pack . The "agents " did nothing too help the victims , they instead tore up the blue stage opposite the bombing area . As seen in the pictures . ---------- Post added 21-04-2013 at 19:21 ---------- OK I've looked at your photos. They highlight two males, on older man with no backpack, one younger man with a large backpack. Prior to the explosion they are near but not within 10 yards to the first bomb. A time after the explosion they are on the other side of the street. The younger male still has his backpack. They then start to tear down hoardings. My analisis. Father and son out watching the race, from the body language in photo one they are about to move on (maybe mom had finished the race and they were going round to meet her?) so were not caught in the blast. Having crossed the street and seen the explosion they make phonecalls to loved ones to say they are OK and then get stuck into helping emergency crews tear down hoardings to use as stretchers for the scores of wounded. Could be two mates rather than father and son but that's very likely the story behind your photos. Good points however - New pictures show one of the men missing his back pack - Your "son" suspect ( who really is undercover agent ) is missing his big black back pack . http://www.silvergoldsilver.com/entry/hey-bro-where-d-your-backpack-go But your son and father theory is a little strange as there are at least another 5 men all dressed the same , could they be uncles and brothers ? ---------- Post added 21-04-2013 at 19:27 ---------- Does the word 'undercover' mean something different to you than it does to most other people? Wearing a standard uniform, driving around in a black vehicle with comm gear on the roof and blacked out windows, standing around for hours in plain sight using ear pieces and other comm devices, that says 'undercover' to you? *shakes head in disbelief* Well some on here are adamant the undercover team were father and son ( plus uncles ) What do you mean by common gear ? The undercover unmarked 4x4 had very very high tech communication equipment on the roof , unless a satellite dish amoung other equipment sounds common too you ? But hey your institled too your own opinion aren't you ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Thank you for looking at the photos of the undercover agents . There are at least 5 of the men all dressed the same . Some have the exact same back packs as the ones which exploded . One of the men in the NEW picture shows him missing his black back pack . The "agents " did nothing too help the victims , they instead tore up the blue stage opposite the bombing area . As seen in the pictures . ---------- Post added 21-04-2013 at 19:21 ---------- Good points however - New pictures show one of the men missing his back pack - Your "son" suspect ( who really is undercover agent ) is missing his big black back pack . http://www.silvergoldsilver.com/entry/hey-bro-where-d-your-backpack-go But your son and father theory is a little strange as there are at least another 5 men all dressed the same , could they be uncles and brothers ? ---------- Post added 21-04-2013 at 19:27 ---------- Well some on here are adamant the undercover team were father and son ( plus uncles ) What do you mean by common gear ? The undercover unmarked 4x4 had very very high tech communication equipment on the roof , unless a satellite dish amoung other equipment sounds common too you ? But hey your institled too your own opinion aren't you ? Don't know where you getting 5 from, but that's moot at the moment. Are you conceding they are legit agents, which is quite conceivable and if so why is it sinister ?ive seen plain clothes at football matches. And if they were plain clothes agents/police why wouldn't they go to a command/control vehicle ? Also if they believed it was a coordinated attack is it not unreasonable to check the opposite stage in lieu of any concrete info at the time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 What do you mean by common gear ? The undercover unmarked 4x4 had very very high tech communication equipment on the roof , unless a satellite dish amoung other equipment sounds common too you ? Yeah - satellite dishes are really uncommon - they've only been on the top of outside broadcast vehicles for the last twenty odd years - have a wander down the Crucible sometime when the snooker is on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SBCY Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Don't know where you getting 5 from, but that's moot at the moment. Are you conceding they are legit agents, which is quite conceivable and if so why is it sinister ?ive seen plain clothes at football matches. And if they were plain clothes agents/police why wouldn't they go to a command/control vehicle ? Also if they believed it was a coordinated attack is it not unreasonable to check the opposite stage in lieu of any concrete info at the time? We are then both in agreement . I also accept they are undercover agents . It looks like they are : "National guard CST teams " By the way they are all dressed it looks like they are CST . It's also confirmed the device he was holding was a radiation detector : http://www.infowars.com/military-men-witnessed-at-boston-bombing-identified-as-national-guard-cst-teams/ Conclusion is that at best they were there as a training exercise . What do you think ? ---------- Post added 21-04-2013 at 20:00 ---------- Yeah - satellite dishes are really uncommon - they've only been on the top of outside broadcast vehicles for the last twenty odd years - have a wander down the Crucible sometime when the snooker is on. Please take a look at the pictures again . The 4x4 does not belong too the media , unless the media now have blue undercover police flashing lights ? http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-L5gbvOBkNdA/UXD4vDrlitI/AAAAAAAAHKY/0DtJlwlWZEE/s1600/SUV_Arrives.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 We are then both in agreement . I also accept they are undercover agents . It looks like they are : "National guard CST teams " By the way they are all dressed it looks like they are CST . It's also confirmed the device he was holding was a radiation detector : http://www.infowars.com/military-men-witnessed-at-boston-bombing-identified-as-national-guard-cst-teams/ Conclusion is that at best they were there as a training exercise . What do you think ? ---------- Post added 21-04-2013 at 20:00 ---------- Please take a look at the pictures again . The 4x4 does not belong too the media , unless the media now have blue undercover police flashing lights ? http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-L5gbvOBkNdA/UXD4vDrlitI/AAAAAAAAHKY/0DtJlwlWZEE/s1600/SUV_Arrives.jpg I have no idea what he has in his hand. If you show another image Id be interested but as it stands nothing is confirmed. Could be national guard (400 were on duty that day) but massachusetts national guard doesn't have a cst team - not according to what I've read. I still see no conspiracy here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 .......... Conclusion is that at best they were there as a training exercise . What do you think ? I think that you have problems reading the articles that you link to. They tell you exactly why the CST were there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Who has verified these photos? How do we know they have not been tampered with, or edited to show a different story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Please take a look at the pictures again . The 4x4 does not belong too the media , unless the media now have blue undercover police flashing lights ? http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-L5gbvOBkNdA/UXD4vDrlitI/AAAAAAAAHKY/0DtJlwlWZEE/s1600/SUV_Arrives.jpg Clearly it does not belong to the media. It belongs to either the police or FBI has a massive coms array, prominent blues and twos and a large hydraulic winch array on the front. So as far from "undercover" as you can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Please take a look at the pictures again . The 4x4 does not belong too the media , unless the media now have blue undercover police flashing lights ? http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-L5gbvOBkNdA/UXD4vDrlitI/AAAAAAAAHKY/0DtJlwlWZEE/s1600/SUV_Arrives.jpg So it's likely a vehicle used by first responders at the scene of major incident with secure comms. Who'd have thought it at a major incident. AFAIK (going back 30 plus years) the ambulance major incident vehicle in South Yorks was "unmarked" so as the general public didn't think it was an ambulance and try to put casualties on board. Scary eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SBCY Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 I have no idea what he has in his hand. If you show another image Id be interested but as it stands nothing is confirmed. Could be national guard (400 were on duty that day) but massachusetts national guard doesn't have a cst team - not according to what I've read. I still see no conspiracy here. They are CST . That's very very obvious The object in his hand is a radiation detector . That's confirmed by the photos which have been posted . I've not said anything about a conspiracy , just reposting photos that we were told "NOT TOO LOOK AT". ---------- Post added 21-04-2013 at 22:32 ---------- Clearly it does not belong to the media. It belongs to either the police or FBI has a massive coms array, prominent blues and twos and a large hydraulic winch array on the front. So as far from "undercover" as you can get. Well at least we have that cleared up The unmarked SUV did indeed belong too the under cover team out there on the finish line . Undercover meaning it was unmarked . ---------- Post added 21-04-2013 at 22:38 ---------- So it's likely a vehicle used by first responders at the scene of major incident with secure comms. Who'd have thought it at a major incident. AFAIK (going back 30 plus years) the ambulance major incident vehicle in South Yorks was "unmarked" so as the general public didn't think it was an ambulance and try to put casualties on board. Scary eh? ?? So you've changed your mind about the 4x4 belonging too the media ? It was very obivious it belongs too the undercover agents . But it was also not used in any way too help the casualties . Actually NON of the undercover agents even attempted too help the injured , going on by the photos - http://imgur.com/a/sUrnA Breaking news detailing the Saudi connection : Saudi national being deported on national security grounds . Obama had too have a meeting with saudi ambassador : http://www.infowars.com/abdul-rahman-ali-al-harbi-bombing-person-of-interest-has-6-saudi-terrorists-in-family5-more-are-in-gitmo/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.