mrs patching Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 I do not believe for one second he has memory loss. If he is found guilty time in solitary should help convince him to tell where her body is , or what he did to dispose of it. For every week he refuses a month extra on his own should be added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bloom Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 I was surprised to see the pictures of inside his cottage on the evening news. Is that what we can expect now then that under British justice before you've been tried you can expect the inside of your house to be on tv? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I1L2T3 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 I was surprised to see the pictures of inside his cottage on the evening news. Is that what we can expect now then that under British justice before you've been tried you can expect the inside of your house to be on tv? I don't understand that either. Surely the photos are evidence in the trial. The public doesn't need to see them now, if at all. What does it gain putting them on the news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 As and when the defendant is found guilty of the murder of this child can anyone give me a good reason why morally he should not be put to death? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarpetPedals Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Can anyone tell me why we need to know about this? Rubberneckin', Ignorant theorizin', goulish finger pointerin'. Strong minds discuss Ideas. Average minds discuss events. Weak minds discuss people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megalithic Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 As and when the defendant is found guilty of the murder of this child can anyone give me a good reason why morally he should not be put to death? I like the cut of your jib. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bloom Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Can anyone tell me why we need to know about this? Rubberneckin', Ignorant theorizin', goulish finger pointerin'. Strong minds discuss Ideas. Average minds discuss events. Weak minds discuss people. What in particular? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crosser Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 As and when the defendant is found guilty of the murder of this child can anyone give me a good reason why morally he should not be put to death? Now will enter the realm of "mental disorder" Lots of people say EG: he must have been mad to do that! And the same people say he should be hung for doing that! Either way he won't be put to death, because it simply isn't an option. Had the Birmingham six been dealt with in that way, there most definitely would NOT have been a "peace process" in NI but that's a different topic. In this particular case, I think that he will be locked away in a secure institution until there is some absolute proof, because so-far it seems damning, but mostly circumstancial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinz Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Now will enter the realm of "mental disorder" Lots of people say EG: he must have been mad to do that! And the same people say he should be hung for doing that! Either way he won't be put to death, because it simply isn't an option. Had the Birmingham six been dealt with in that way, there most definitely would NOT have been a "peace process" in NI but that's a different topic. In this particular case, I think that he will be locked away in a secure institution until there is some absolute proof, because so-far it seems damning, but mostly circumstancial. You're right of course.. all the question feeds is the back n forth with the what about using a blo torch against those that uphold the present system..basically a tit for tat discussion..on a murdered childs thread. Not very dignified. ---------- Post added 03-05-2013 at 00:54 ---------- Can anyone tell me why we need to know about this? Rubberneckin', Ignorant theorizin', goulish finger pointerin'. Strong minds discuss Ideas. Average minds discuss events. Weak minds discuss people. Only if you tell us why you need to know, first...fair is fair..huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygardener Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 You're right of course.. all the question feeds is the back n forth with the what about using a blo torch against those that uphold the present system..basically a tit for tat discussion..on a murdered childs thread. Not very dignified. I do not apologise for raising the issue of suitable punishment for her killer in a thread about her alledged murderers trial. This isn't an RIP thread, we had one when her life was brutally taken. This is a justice thread. So that out of the way can you answer the question? It's "As and when the defendant is found guilty of the murder of this child can anyone give me a good reason why morally he should not be put to death?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.