Lockjaw Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 (edited) I'm not convinced, because the road isn't as bendy and the window lintels are different, Agreed. I guess it depends how accurate he was and how much artistic license was used. The archway would seem the most obvious recognition feature - I wonder therefore, since nobody has recognised it, if the house still stands. Edited February 5, 2015 by Lockjaw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leah-Lacie Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.354849,-1.574221,3a,75y,225.9h,76.37t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sXlh5kHTIBy8hDVjo9fyJeg!2e0 This is the one I was thinking of, if the link works. As above though, no pavement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommo68 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Drivel removed. If you can't contribute then don't post. I am intrigued as to what you posted to warrant that kind of treatment mort. Drivel is not always removed. . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leah-Lacie Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Here? Only because of the position of the arched window, though it looks like a passageway on the painting. And the pavement; the bit outside the gate is almost identical. This seems the most likely to me, especially as he had been just feet away painting the back of the roundhouse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now