Halibut Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 It doesn't matter in the slightest. Equality laws are there for a reason. You can't pick and choose them according to personal taste. I see that went straight over your head then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happ Hazzard Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 What went over my head? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffragette1 Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 As I have said before I have never accused you of that. Either prove it, or withdraw your accusation. As for your position on banning page 3, I have repeated your own words - post #50 as I recall. If you don;t like that then please don't make those statements. Right, have read back and must have been confusing you with someone else, as you kind of all merge into one to be honest. Anyway apologies for that. Yes, I support banning page 3, quasi-porn has no place in a daily newspaper, as the petition says, do you see women flash up bare breasted on the news? There are plenty of other places for topless photos and plenty of opportunities for glamour models to pose naked or semi-nude. I have made my position quite clear on this. It makes me wonder if the men who buy the Sun for a quick ogle are too embarrassed to go and buy a porn magazine or something and because it's so normalised in the Sun, they feel justified? All they have to do is go online and they could see millions of naked breasts and nipples if they want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 What went over my head? Exactly. Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffragette1 Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Exactly. Cheers. Gender theory is beyond the ken of many, probably because it suits there agendas although monumental stupidity plays a role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happ Hazzard Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 No argument then, Halibut? People like you are utterly pathetic. It's no longer the left are an utter laughing stock nowadays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 What is "current feminist thinking"? Don't feminists think for themselves? Yes, of course they do. How does the phrase 'current feminist thinking' imply anything other? Is English your first language? ---------- Post added 28-05-2013 at 13:49 ---------- No argument then, Halibut? People like you are utterly pathetic. It's no longer the left are an utter laughing stock nowadays. You might want to edit that. It doesn't make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 No argument then, Halibut? People like you are utterly pathetic. It's no longer the left are an utter laughing stock nowadays. Adjective, verb, what's the difference.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happ Hazzard Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Stop talking rubbish. If feminists think for themselves, why is there such a thing as "current feminist thinking"? Surely feminists have a wide range of opinions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted May 28, 2013 Share Posted May 28, 2013 Right, have read back and must have been confusing you with someone else, as you kind of all merge into one to be honest. Anyway apologies for that. Yes, I support banning page 3, quasi-porn has no place in a daily newspaper, as the petition says, do you see women flash up bare breasted on the news? There are plenty of other places for topless photos and plenty of opportunities for glamour models to pose naked or semi-nude. I have made my position quite clear on this. It makes me wonder if the men who buy the Sun for a quick ogle are too embarrassed to go and buy a porn magazine or something and because it's so normalised in the Sun, they feel justified? All they have to do is go online and they could see millions of naked breasts and nipples if they want. Thank you for your retraction. However you haven't made your position clear. You want to ban Page 3 for various reasons (of which I don't intend to debate here) but you want women to be able to choose what they wish to do and don't do. Those two viewpoints are in opposition to each other. Can you clarify this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.