Phanerothyme Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 Why is it when a tory is caught fiddling people like you will jump up and down, get very red faced and say its the same ol'tory greed. But when Labour get caught you come back with, "well the tories are just as bad". People like me? I'm not one for smileys but Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeMac Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 There are better ones than that.. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/businesslatestnews/9668396/Margaret-Hodges-family-company-pays-just-0.01pc-tax-on-2.1bn-of-business-generated-in-the-UK.html Pot..Kettle? Conrad Black Well, he used to own the Torygraph and it made a neat reply. The story you link to is a non-story. It was a smear against PAC. We could all do with the PAC being effective at sorting out tax dodging companies. That should be an item of political common ground, not petty squabbling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 Conrad Black Well, he used to own the Torygraph and it made a neat reply. The story you link to is a non-story. It was a smear against PAC. We could all do with the PAC being effective at sorting out tax dodging companies. That should be an item of political common ground, not petty squabbling. I never saw the retraction in the Telegraph.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeMac Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 I never saw the retraction in the Telegraph.... You would have needed your reading specs on to see it. Here it is in all of its glory Can you think of a reason why the original article should be so prominent and the apology so small? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 You would have needed your reading specs on to see it. Here it is in all of its glory Can you think of a reason why the original article should be so prominent and the apology so small? Of course, but it's always the same no matter who's doing it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L00b Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 Here it is in all of its gloryAh, that clears up the fog a bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 You would have needed your reading specs on to see it. Here it is in all of its glory Can you think of a reason why the original article should be so prominent and the apology so small? can you think why the usual suspects haven't posted on this thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikeMac Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 can you think why the usual suspects haven't posted on this thread? Because it is riddled with erroneous information? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truman Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 Because it is riddled with erroneous information? What is.. the news about the share donation in the opening post? You did read that didn't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeX Posted June 6, 2013 Share Posted June 6, 2013 can you think why the usual suspects haven't posted on this thread? They are brain storming on how best to detract from this headline and make accusations about other political parties. Their first attempt failed, however Labour apologists are easily startled but they'll soon be back, and in greater numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.