melthebell Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 keep him alive, its not what he wants, that's punishment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRESLEY Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 I'm not sympathising - I'm just pointing out that your claim that he's 'had a life of Riley' is obviously ludicrous. Which it is. He had has a life of Riley compared to what he should have got for the horrendous crimes he and her committed, and yes you are sympathising. Write a letter to one of the children' parents stating your views and see what type of reply you get back. ---------- Post added 26-06-2013 at 08:28 ---------- keep him alive, its not what he wants, that's punishment I agree, here is a good Punishment, put him in a cell the with the murdered children's mothers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Orange Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 keep him alive, its not what he wants, that's punishment Exactly, but some on here are so short sighted to see this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 I really couldn't care less what happens to him and I'm mildly annoyed to have to hear his name in the news again. What he thinks should have no relevance whatsoever and people should be able to not have to even consider his existence or hear his name again. Agreed. If the reports are true about Brady eating it seems hes still playing his sick game ,as long as Bennets body remains missing ,in his mind,Brady has committed the perfect murder, which reading about him was likely his intention and if not for the fact he tried to bring a third party into his scheme who knows how many more they would have gone on to kill,you can all vote and make your comments until the cows come home Brady will play his own game until the end and no amount of persuasion or promises will change his views,he may reveal all in his last moments or he may just laugh in the faces of those present. Bennet is a tool he uses continuously. The media continue to play his game by reporting his game. He's a coward. If his wishes were granted he'd soon change his tune. He knows those wishes won't so plays "keep me in the limelight"..Bennet is all he has left of his miserable existence. So again I agree..it's all just a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rupert_Baehr Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 I don't think he would off himself. He's a nasty manipulative individual. Whether he stays in hospital or is returned to prison, perhaps the best thing to do would be to ignore him. He seems to thrive on publicity (and the odd slice of toast.) Give him the toast, but forget about the publicity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geared Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Keep him alive, and when his organs start to fail stuff replacement pig organs in to keep him alive even longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olive Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Agreed. Bennet is a tool he uses continuously. The media continue to play his game by reporting his game. He's a coward. If his wishes were granted he'd soon change his tune. He knows those wishes won't so plays "keep me in the limelight"..Bennet is all he has left of his miserable existence. So again I agree..it's all just a game. Totally agree. We just have to go by the letter of the law on this one. We'd get totally bogged down if not, which would ultimately end up playing his game. - Want to punish him? - Keep him alive. - Want see the end of the vile creature? - Let him die (although I agree, he won't go through with it) - Don't want to waste £thousands more keeping him going, keeping the courts busy - Let him die - Don't want to give him any more publicity - do whatever the law tells us depending on his psychiatric assessment. To be honest, parts of me wants to see all of these outcomes, but that's not possible, so there's only one way to go - follow the law as it would apply to anyone else. The sooner he goes of natural causes, the better of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lipschitz Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Keep the sick freak alive and play the tapes he made as he and Myra tortured these kids to him 24/7 as a reminder to him why we won't let him take the cowards way out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
llamatron Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 He shouldn't have the choice. I voted Keep him alive. cutting your nose off to spite your face springs to mind! Let him die-we are paying a lot of money to keep him, that money could be used to help families of murder victims, or to pay for more forensics, police etc. Its totally ridiculous to spend money and time punishing him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamrocker Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 keep him alive, its not what he wants, that's punishment You cant punish Brady, whichever option is chosen Brady wins, all this hoo hah about him wanting to die is still his game,if they keep him in Ashworth he will still continue playing his mind games ,if they move him he's proven he's not insane which by his actions he obviously his.If they move him I wouldnt be surprised if he sues and goes to the ECHR in objection to have been certified insane for so long,as long as hes certified insane he's locked up ,period,if he's moved and recognized as not insane he's eligible for parole,I dont think he was given a tariff,ok he's never going to get parole but its another part of the game to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.