natjack Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 the description of the video you just posted says it all the words contueing and against says it all So 'the advice of' now means 'the orders of'? Irrespective of what Robinson was doing or what his intentions were, he should be able to walk anywhere he wants to in this country without fear of being attacked for his opinions. They let all the foaming islamists vent off all over the place without much being done about it. Mainly, I think, because we now know what nutjobs they are, and people, even the police, are a bit scared of them. They have no respect for anyone's life, not even their own. As for mafya's question about Choudary, I'd think he'd be given police protection and say and do whatever he wanted, like he was when he was organising his racist marches through Luton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SevenRivers Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 exactly as ive said all along, BOTH are different sides of the same coin, BOTH benefit from the current situation, BOTH should be ignored Like the Woolwich murderers were ignored? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retep Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 He's Keeper of the Leader's Commode No your job's safe I was classed as over qualified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafya Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 King tommy to some and his jester have been released on bail, this article tells what really happened= http://news.sky.com/story/1109545/edl-leader-tommy-robinson-released-on-bail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retep Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 King tommy to some and his jester have been released on bail, this article tells what really happened= http://news.sky.com/story/1109545/edl-leader-tommy-robinson-released-on-bail The world can see what really happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxmaximus Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 King tommy to some and his jester have been released on bail, this article tells what really happened= http://news.sky.com/story/1109545/edl-leader-tommy-robinson-released-on-bail Apart from he didn't obstruct them, the police just trumped up the charge because they had no reason to arrest them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
natjack Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 King tommy to some and his jester have been released on bail, this article tells what really happened= http://news.sky.com/story/1109545/edl-leader-tommy-robinson-released-on-bail So in other words, they were prevented from walking through part of our capital city, because of fears that some Muslims would be offended and start kicking off? They're always being offended and kicking off about one thing or another, we should be used to it by now. If the locals had started a riot, well get them arrested and charged for public disorder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 So in other words, they were prevented from walking through part of our capital city, because of fears that some Muslims would be offended and start kicking off? They're always being offended and kicking off about one thing or another, we should be used to it by now. If the locals had started a riot, well get them arrested and charged for public disorder. 11 pages and we have just gone round in a circle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxmaximus Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 oh give over they wernt just walking for charity and you cant have free speech for one without the other Its your bias that leads you to believe they walked for a different reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafya Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 There is no comparison between poppy burning Muslim protesters at homecoming parades and two men out walking for charity. Now if they had been burning pages from the Quran you might have a point. But even then the Quran is meaningless nonsense written on behalf of a war monger, whilst the poppies significance in our society is a lasting memorial symbol to the fallen. My Bold= Some of the fallen were muslims so by being offensive about the Quran you are showing disrespect to some of the fallen who you say the poppies are a lasting memorial to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.