Green Web Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-17942299 In my experience the Met are more racist than UKIP, the EDL and the BNP together. Never known such a blatant racist corrupt force. the Mets powers were described as "incompatible" with human rights and using stop and search powers disproportionately against black people without any adequate explanation. So hopefully (although doubtful) the High Court will take note and the Met will stop harassing black people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 "High Court wants the Met to stop criminalising black people" Once again you are misrepresenting an article. The High Court doesn't want the Met to stop anything (yet). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-17942299 In my experience the Met are more racist than UKIP, the EDL and the BNP together. Never known such a blatant racist corrupt force. the Mets powers were described as "incompatible" with human rights and using stop and search powers disproportionately against black people without any adequate explanation. So hopefully (although doubtful) the High Court will take note and the Met will stop harassing black people. What is your experience Green Web? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Hardie Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-17942299 In my experience the Met are more racist than UKIP, the EDL and the BNP together. Never known such a blatant racist corrupt force. the Mets powers were described as "incompatible" with human rights and using stop and search powers disproportionately against black people without any adequate explanation. So hopefully (although doubtful) the High Court will take note and the Met will stop harassing black people. Nowhere in the linked story does it say the High Court wants the Met 'to stop criminalising black people'. That is purely a construct of your own making. How is it possible to 'criminalise' anyone who isn't a criminal in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Web Posted July 5, 2013 Author Share Posted July 5, 2013 What is your experience Green Web? I have relatives in Haringey and my brother lives on the notorious Pepys Estate in Deptford which is at least 90% black, and locally known as mini Detroit. His black friends, neighbours are routinely stopped, searched and humiliated by the Met, they tried to frame my mate for burglary (no previous for anything) when he wasn't even in London at the time of alleged offence! Whilst my white bother who looks no older than 25, drives a sporty Saab, wears expensive clothing and regularly drives at night has never been stopped or searched. ---------- Post added 05-07-2013 at 02:13 ---------- Nowhere in the linked story does it say the High Court wants the Met 'to stop criminalising black people'. That is purely a construct of your own making. How is it possible to 'criminalise' anyone who isn't a criminal in the first place? I said hopefully in the OP and can't change the title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecky Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 Well about 3 days after the news breaks it makes it onto SF. What you moaning about? It fits in with the government's plans to cut the police force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geared Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 the Mets powers were described as "incompatible" with human rights and using stop and search powers disproportionately against black people without any adequate explanation. They stop a disproportionate amount of black youths because a disproportionate amount of black youths are found to be carrying weapons and drugs. What would you have them do, walk around freely with guns and knives because it's 'racist' to stop them? You're a frigging moron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daid Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 There's a good chance if an area is 90% black that a black person will be challenged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Web Posted July 7, 2013 Author Share Posted July 7, 2013 They stop a disproportionate amount of black youths because a disproportionate amount of black youths are found to be carrying weapons and drugs. What would you have them do, walk around freely with guns and knives because it's 'racist' to stop them? You're a frigging moron And if the Police stopped a disproportionate of white youths they would also probably find a disproportionate of white youths carrying weapons and drugs. Should we randomly seize whiteys computers because they're disproportionately far more likely to be downloading child porn? And if you're going to insult then at least to make a reasonable argument first, or at least witty. Even my dog could do better. ---------- Post added 07-07-2013 at 16:50 ---------- There's a good chance if an area is 90% black that a black person will be challenged. It is still disproportionate, 90% of white kids on Lowedges and others living on similar crime ridden white sink estates do not face regular blatant harassment and fabricating evidence to stich them up for crimes. To become a Police in the Met you have to bent for the job. ---------- Post added 07-07-2013 at 16:51 ---------- Well about 3 days after the news breaks it makes it onto SF. What you moaning about? It fits in with the government's plans to cut the police force. I was banned. The cuts will only result in more corruption by the Met. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted July 7, 2013 Share Posted July 7, 2013 And if the Police stopped a disproportionate of white youths they would also probably find a disproportionate of white youths carrying weapons and drugs. Should we randomly seize whiteys computers because they're disproportionately far more likely to be downloading child porn? And if you're going to insult then at least to make a reasonable argument first, or at least witty. Even my dog could do better. ---------- Post added 07-07-2013 at 16:50 ---------- It is still disproportionate, 90% of white kids on Lowedges and others living on similar crime ridden white sink estates do not face regular blatant harassment and fabricating evidence to stich them up for crimes. To become a Police in the Met you have to bent for the job. ---------- Post added 07-07-2013 at 16:51 ---------- I was banned. The cuts will only result in more corruption by the Met. I wonder why Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.