What's The Pentagon Hiding?

[megalithic]

OK melthebell, here is just one that isn't:

 

http://blip.tv/checktheevidence/where-did-the-towers-go-one-step-beyond-25-oct-2011-5696277

 

Interesting at the time all this was going off, there was a Hurricane off the state of New York and no-one was evacuated; also check out the missing engine blocks from the cars parked no where near the twin towers and the unusual rusting of one half of the vehicles, with the rest in perfect condition!

 

Oh I see you lumped the BBC News article with YouTube - well not spotted!

 

Can't watch it if you have AB+ enabled.

[BEDROCK]

To be frank, the President does not rule the states, it is the Senate and the Pentagon.

 

Leaders are just public faces to a more deeper organisation.

 

In the UK, the ones with the real power are the House of Lords.

 

The House of Commons cannot do any real change without passing things through the Lords.

[Alien52]

To be frank, the President does not rule the states, it is the Senate and the Pentagon.

 

Leaders are just public faces to a more deeper organisation.

 

I thought your name was Rich.

[swarfendor437]

The hurricane was several hundred miles offshore and followed the path of many hurricanes away from the mainland to the NE - they don't all make landfall you know.

 

Without watching the video (bonkers stuff from Judy Wood) the "rusting" will be fire damage - ever seen a burnt out / fire damaged vehicle?

 

But there's more - guess you can't be bothered to watch - she requested a subpoena for evidence but Supreme Court Judge asked if she was wanting a death wish - guess you'll never know! - they can be used as a source of energy

 

---------- Post added 19-07-2013 at 23:00 ----------

 

Additional information:

 

Here's another four for you melthebell!:

 

http://www.viewzone.com/haarp00.html

 

http://www.viewzone.com/photopara.html

 

http://www.viewzone.com/photopara.html

 

http://www.viewzone.com/photopara.html

[Longcol]

To be frank, the President does not rule the states, it is the Senate and the Pentagon.

 

Leaders are just public faces to a more deeper organisation.

 

You mean a democratically elected body - the Senate - has some power in the USA you'll never make a fully fledged conspiracy theorist

[BEDROCK]

OK, time to enlighten some people Bedrock!

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8004X76iXFk

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKhFjSI93qY

 

 

Seems to me scientists have booked their place in the underground bases by blaming plebiscites for Global warming - NB There are 3/4 HAARP facilities near the North Pole - The US Military base at Gakona Alaska, European Union Weather Weapon at Omsk in Norway, and those lovely people who started it all off, the Russians - they tried to do it with Short Wave Radio close to the Iron Curtain in the 70's - which led to the international agreement that no country would use Weather Weapons on other nations - see the Ventura program - that explains it all. And Blighty? Also guilty of the deaths of people in the Lynmouth disaster in 1952 - Operation Cumulus.

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1516880.stm

 

The twin towers - building 7 reported on 'pre air' reporting by BBC BEFORE it went off!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8Yx-tp_V8I

 

Just catching the Body Ventura speaking, never knew he was so intelligent, very interesting things he is saying.

 

---------- Post added 19-07-2013 at 23:06 ----------

 

You mean a democratically elected body - the Senate - has some power in the USA you'll never make a fully fledged conspiracy theorist

 

I would not say democratic, are they any different to our lords?

 

You notice how Obama is really in favour of gun control but is a lame duck when faced with the Senate.

[Longcol]

To be frank, the President does not rule the states, it is the Senate and the Pentagon.

 

Leaders are just public faces to a more deeper organisation.

 

In the UK, the ones with the real power are the House of Lords.

 

The House of Commons cannot do any real change without passing things through the Lords.

 

You've never heard of the Parliament Acts or the Salisbury Convention I take it.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Lords

 

"The House of Lords debates legislation, and has power to amend or reject bills. However, the power of the Lords to reject a bill passed by the House of Commons is severely restricted by the Parliament Acts. Under those Acts, certain types of bills may be presented for the Royal Assent without the consent of the House of Lords (i.e. the Commons can override the Lords' veto). The House of Lords cannot delay a money bill (a bill that, in the view of the Speaker of the House of Commons, solely concerns national taxation or public funds) for more than one month."

 

Other public bills cannot be delayed by the House of Lords for more than two parliamentary sessions, or one calendar year. These provisions, however, only apply to public bills that originate in the House of Commons, and cannot have the effect of extending a parliamentary term beyond five years. A further restriction is a constitutional convention known as the Salisbury Convention, which means that the House of Lords does not oppose legislation promised in the Government's election manifesto.

 

---------- Post added 19-07-2013 at 23:10 ----------

 

I would not say democratic, are they any different to our lords?

.

 

Yes - Senate is elected, the Lords aren't.

[BEDROCK]

You've never heard of the Parliament Acts or the Salisbury Convention I take it.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Lords

 

"The House of Lords debates legislation, and has power to amend or reject bills. However, the power of the Lords to reject a bill passed by the House of Commons is severely restricted by the Parliament Acts. Under those Acts, certain types of bills may be presented for the Royal Assent without the consent of the House of Lords (i.e. the Commons can override the Lords' veto). The House of Lords cannot delay a money bill (a bill that, in the view of the Speaker of the House of Commons, solely concerns national taxation or public funds) for more than one month."

 

Other public bills cannot be delayed by the House of Lords for more than two parliamentary sessions, or one calendar year. These provisions, however, only apply to public bills that originate in the House of Commons, and cannot have the effect of extending a parliamentary term beyond five years. A further restriction is a constitutional convention known as the Salisbury Convention, which means that the House of Lords does not oppose legislation promised in the Government's election manifesto.

 

---------- Post added 19-07-2013 at 23:10 ----------

 

 

Yes - Senate is elected, the Lords aren't.

 

I believe a large portion of the lords are how should I put it, modern day templars

[Longcol]

I believe a large portion of the lords are how should I put it, modern day templars

 

What difference does that make if their powers to block legislation are seriously curtailed?

[Rampent]

What difference does that make if their powers to block legislation are seriously curtailed?

 

Longcol - are you a freemason?